List traffic today asks about changing rsync to use lightweight
threads instead of heavyweight fork.
Before rushing into building a threads version of rsync, please READ
this recent article (its author is also the co-author of the
well-known, and widely used, gc (garbage collecting version of C
ma
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:22:23AM +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Is there any likelihood of changing the rsync code to use threads
> instead of processes?
I just thought about this a bit more, and it didn't seem as large a task
as I had originally assumed it would be. I also remembered that I'm
go
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||foner-rsync-
|
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:00:42
To:rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: rsync Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6
Send rsync mailing list submissions to
rsync@lists.samba.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists
