Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have two offices in one city; employees work in both of them (once
> in office A, the next or an hour later in office B etc.).
>
> Is it possible with rsync to construct such a "two way file
> synchronizer"?
Try taking at look at unison, it, does
Rsync's method of taking advantage of information common to two machines
to speed the transfer of additional information is interesting
philosophically, and I suspect that additional performance improvements
might be possible if the rsync algorithm were exploited more fully. For
instance, consider
I have two offices in one city; employees work in both of them (once in
office A, the next or an hour later in office B etc.).
They would like to have the same profile (i.e., if they log off in
office A, they would like to have their documents, Desktop, emails etc.
in the profile in the office
Wayne;
Thanks - yep its an old version:
rsync-2.5.7-2.legacy.9
on RedHat 9. I guess I'm going to have to try to find an updated
package or compile from source unless you have another idea.
Thanks!
James
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:33:36AM -0500, James W. Beauchamp wrot
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:33:36AM -0500, James W. Beauchamp wrote:
> 2005-11-08 04:14:42: inflate returned -3 (0 bytes)2005-11-08 04:14:42:
> rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at token.c(416)
Sounds like you're using an older version of rsync -- I fixed a
compression bug
Hi:
I have an rsync server providing four separate areas for rsync clients
to connect to. I only have one client and it is running a backup
script. The nightly backup runs fine through the first three shares
until it gets to one called [webbackup]. This directory contains only 6
files and t
To whoever it is that maintains the web site.
The page at http://samba.anu.edu.au/rsync/resources.html has a link to
the GNU project management page. The link as a space between the
"http://"; and the host name, which means it cannot be opened.
Shachar
--
To unsubscribe or change op
No solution yet :(
I tought that it is ok, but in fact it didn't run without problems. It
was a mistake in shell script and it finished with ok status and I
tought rsync finished with success.
How can I troubleshoot this?
Here is the command line:
rsync --partial --partial-dir=$partial_dir -
Wayne Davison wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:55:06PM -0600, Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
>
>
>>is it likely, or routine, or will-take-some-time, (or all-of-the-above),
>>for that patch to be vetted and integrated into mainline rsync released
>>code?
>>
>>
>
>I'm currently leaning towards inc
