On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:37:48PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:03:30PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Yeah, I think I'm saying just treat (1) and (2) the same way. OTOH,
> > if the behavior is optional and documented, I could definitely see
> > treating (1) as an ex
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:45:14PM +, Steve Tucknott wrote:
> chown GENERO/uk/reinsure/prod/rel/dbmodify.4gl : Operation not permitted
>
> The source file has owner/group stevet:dev and the target stevet:users
Rsync is trying to change the group to match, and that is failing.
> The files are
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:03:30PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Yeah, I think I'm saying just treat (1) and (2) the same way. OTOH,
> if the behavior is optional and documented, I could definitely see
> treating (1) as an exact match.
Yes, perhaps it would be better to let the user decide how
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:50:28PM -0800, Eric Horne wrote:
> rsync -rvzd --include-from=incfile /top/level/dir remote::share
Your problem is that the trailing "dir" in the source is the base of the
transfer, so including "/B/" will not match anything anywhere -- you'd
need to use "/dir/B/" instea
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:55:06PM -0600, Lawrence D. Dunn wrote:
> is it likely, or routine, or will-take-some-time, (or all-of-the-above),
> for that patch to be vetted and integrated into mainline rsync released
> code?
I'm currently leaning towards including this in the next rsync release
unl
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:01:35PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:04:34PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > That option should imply at least, --checksum and --delete-after if
> > --delete at all.
>
> I don't think it needs --checksum because rsync can simply use a
> non-
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:04:34PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> That option should imply at least, --checksum and --delete-after if
> --delete at all.
I don't think it needs --checksum because rsync can simply use a
non-exact match as the basis file for the transfer.
> For each file on the sen
Read Wayne Davidson post sent 31:06
before yours.
73,
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services - ODCS
desk:3039240938
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/07/2005 08:33 AM
To
rsync@lists.samba.org
cc
Subject
[rsync] '-c'
What is the practical/functional difference between using '-c'
(--checksum) & '-I' (--ignore-times), all other related options being
equal ?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-que
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:44:01PM +0800, Adrian Mak wrote:
> the files owner of remote host is uid mary, after executed rsync for
> file synchronization, the files owner of local host will be uid peter,
> instead of mary
If you are copying files via remote-shell rsync, simply login to the
destina
What does rsync do with permissions?
Using rsync -auvP ./* targetMachine:/targetDir
I sometimes get an error/warning such as:
chown GENERO/uk/reinsure/prod/rel/dbmodify.4gl : Operation not permitted
The source file has owner/group stevet:dev and the target stevet:users
The files are being
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3244
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-07 08:40 ---
Thanks Wayne for that.
I have probably found the cause of the problem. I was copying the /sys
directory and that seemed to cause problems. It seems to be a system depe
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 10:18:24AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Care to elaborate on the security implications? What is the potential
> for a DoS on someone giving out rsync services to basically untrusted
> parties?
I haven't thought it all through but one thing for sure is that larger
TCP buf
Jason,
Summary guess-on-my-part:
"Maybe" (w.r.t. will_larger_buffers_help?). Depending on which
satellite-height you're
using, and what your current default buffers are, and which-operating-system,
1-4Mbps is on the edge where more-than-default buffers are useful.
More detail below.
(
14 matches
Mail list logo
