Re: Worrisome race condition involving half-transferred files

On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 14:33 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > This is not something that is unique to rsync. For instance, if I > hard-link a file in that dir to a file that is owned by root, and root > uses "cp" to update that file, the hard-linked, root-owned file will be > affected. True. Inciden

RE: Cygwin: Back up open files?

Yes, the file is substantially re-arranged each night. This is the default for Exchange 2000 and 2003 and seems to be strongly recommended. I'm sure it would be possible to map the changes in the .edb file before and after a defrag, I can't say how much changes. Can anyone give me a hint how I

Re: Worrisome race condition involving half-transferred files

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:31:43AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > Tell me if I'm wrong, but rsync seems to have a very serious race > condition that would make it risky to transfer files into a directory > writable by someone you don't trust if permissions are going to be > granted to other people

[Bug 3169] Dirvish should probably be mentioned on the resources page

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3169 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|NEW

[Bug 3168] --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in 2.6.6

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 11:48 --- (In reply to comment #2) > --min-size has never been released in a version of rsync except in the patchs > dir. I know that Debian has released several versions with --

[Bug 3168] --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in 2.6.6

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

rsync output question

Hello,   I am synchronizing one ~15GB file over the network. This file from the previous day exists on the destination and I synchronized today's file over. This is the output.   Number of files: 1Number of files transferred: 1Total file size: 15919685632 bytesTotal transferred file si

Re: Update: Re: Help with synchronizing two directories on remoteservers

On Fri 14 Oct 2005, symbulos - ethical services (external mailing lists) wrote: > Here are answers to all you questions, I hope. > > The platforms are: > > 1)administration desktop (pc here) > Mandriva LE2005 > > 2)servera > Debian 3.0 > > 3)serverb > Fedora Core 3 > > ssh from servera to ser

Re: Update: Re: Help with synchronizing two directories on remoteservers

Here are answers to all you questions, I hope. The platforms are: 1)administration desktop (pc here) Mandriva LE2005 2)servera Debian 3.0 3)serverb Fedora Core 3 ssh from servera to serverb (in a remote ssh shell from "pc here") is working ssh from serverb to severa (in a remote ssh shell fr

[Bug 3169] New: Dirvish should probably be mentioned on the resources page

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3169 Summary: Dirvish should probably be mentioned on the resources page Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: All URL: http://samba.anu.edu.au/rsync/resources.html OS

[Bug 3168] --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in 2.6.6

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-14 04:50 --- Obtw, when this gets reinstated, it would be -really nice- if one or the other (but NOT BOTH) of --max-size or --min-size was an "OR EQUAL". Right now, if I'm trying to

[Bug 3168] New: --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in 2.6.6

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 Summary: --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in 2.6.6 Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: maj