On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:48:39PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote:
> This works fine, however when trying to use cp -al to make incremental
> copies, each copy always ends up being 53Gb in size.
How are you measuring that? If you use "du" on individual directory
hierarchies, it will always report the f
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:10:31PM +0200, Guillaume Etorre wrote:
> Is there any reason for --delete not to delete when used with --dirs?
It's a historical reason due to the original delete code only knowing
how to handle a from-the-top recursion pass. When I improved the delete
code in 2.6.4 (im
Your message with subject MESSAGE COULD NOT BE DELIVERED sent on
09/28/05, 02:49:17 contained one or more attachments not allowed by
Chevron and was blocked.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/s
