Re: how to get around rsync error (OS X Tiger)

2005-08-21 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:31:10PM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote: > So, the option to override this behavior would be "--inplace" I > assume, and do yo know of any caveats regarding such locally? If you're doing a local transfer, (which implies --whole-file), the only adverse effect of --inplace would

Re: how to get around rsync error (OS X Tiger)

2005-08-21 Thread Lee Cullens
Lee Cullens wrote: Wayne Davison wrote: On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:43:50PM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote: The most logical place to ask this question is this rsync forum, but no one has yet even acknowledged the issue. I was hoping that a MacOS user would respond and help you out since th

Re: how to get around rsync error (OS X Tiger)

2005-08-21 Thread Lee Cullens
Wayne Davison wrote: On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:43:50PM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote: The most logical place to ask this question is this rsync forum, but no one has yet even acknowledged the issue. I was hoping that a MacOS user would respond and help you out since this issue appears to

[Bug 3021] No deletion on receiver side when using --delete and --files-from

2005-08-21 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3021 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Cygwin bug in hosts allow

2005-08-21 Thread Bill Denney
When using cygwin, I tried to specify the subnet mask for the "hosts allow" option in rsyncd.conf with 192.168.1.0/24, but that didn't work. I had to use 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0. With /24, it gives this error @ERROR: access denied to mymodule from rsyncclient (192.168.1.20) rsync error: erro

Re: Rsync 2.6.3 does not show to be deleted files. Bug?

2005-08-21 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:43:30PM +0200, Gerben Wierda wrote: > I get no such delete messages, but files will be deleted. When I look > at the log file where rsync logs to I see [delete messages] Upgrading to 2.6.6 should fix that. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.

Re: how to get around rsync error (OS X Tiger)

2005-08-21 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:43:50PM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote: > The most logical place to ask this question is this rsync forum, but > no one has yet even acknowledged the issue. I was hoping that a MacOS user would respond and help you out since this issue appears to be specific to MacOS. As for

Rsync 2.6.3 does not show to be deleted files. Bug?

2005-08-21 Thread Gerben Wierda
Hi, I am running rsync 2.6.3 on Mac OS X 10.4. I have set up rsync to act as rsync server on one machine with a module entry like this: syslog facility = local5 [src-rw] path = /usr/local/src comment = whole /usr/local/src tree hosts allow = [ip addresses deleted]

Re: how to get around rsync error (OS X Tiger)

2005-08-21 Thread Lee Cullens
Another work-around here would be in my differential update script to simply clear /System/Library/CoreServices/* each time and let it be recopied. Versus the exclude work-around it has more assurance of maintaining system consistency - but it's still just a work-around to the root problem.

[Bug 3021] No deletion on receiver side when using --delete and --files-from

2005-08-21 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3021 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-21 09:56 --- Sorry, I'am not using: >>rsync -aHvzc --delete --delete-excluded --exclude-from=$TOEXCULE_LIST_FILES but >>rsync -aHvzc --delete--files-from=$TORSYNC_LIST_FILES And

[Bug 3021] New: No deletion on receiver side when using --delete and --files-from

2005-08-21 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3021 Summary: No deletion on receiver side when using --delete and -- files-from Product: rsync Version: 2.6.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severit