https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 14:07 ---
I had meant to include some suggestions for remote-to-remote copying but forgot.
Let's remedy that.
Let's say you wish to be able to run "rsync -av host1:file host2:"
Panda Antivirus has found a virus in:
File:
Name: [letter.zip][letter.zip][letter.txt
.scr]
MIME type: application/octet-stream
Malware found: W32/Mydoom.N.worm
Action carried
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2881
Summary: delete-exclude
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
A
But it sounds like there is definitely an rsync port to D'ohnet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Thornton
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 2:18 PM
To: Stuart Halliday
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: DotNet Version Of Rsync
Stua
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2871
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 12:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=1314)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1314&action=view)
Reject both source and destination specifying a host
Here's a patch
Stuart Halliday wrote:
R-type Studios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
Hi People,
Just wondering if anyone has ported rsync to dotnet yet?
Thanks
Alex
Err why?
Isn't the current Windows commandline version good enough?
Or am I missing something? :-)
A certain lack of reliability on so
Sorry. Went back to source and it does work properly. My binaries have
been tinkered with
--
The information contained in this electronic communication and any document
attached hereto or transmitted herewith is confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the individual or entity nam
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 12:15:41PM -0600, Larry Bernstone wrote:
> In rsync 2.5, using the --backup and --backup-dir switches without a
> --suffix would copy backed up files to the backup dir with no extension.
This is true in all versions of rsync (that I know of), including all
2.6.x versions.
In rsync 2.5, using the --backup and --backup-dir switches without a
--suffix would copy backed up files to the backup dir with no extension.
In 2.6, you must use a blank suffix ("suffix=") in order to get the
same behavior. This means that 2.5 clients are unable to backup to the
server without p
I have recently designed a backup strategy for my company built around RSYNC.
The strategy appears sound for NetWare NSS data and Linux/Unix data as the
filesystem permissions are maintained (though some hackery is required for
NetWare).
However, recently a large amount of Windows data has b
R-type Studios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Hi People,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has ported rsync to dotnet yet?
>
> Thanks
> Alex
Err why?
Isn't the current Windows commandline version good enough?
Or am I missing something? :-)
--
Stuart Halliday
ECS Technology ltd
Registered in Scotland
On Fri 15 Jul 2005, Robert Gasch wrote:
>
> > The output from strace and lsof would be helpful.
> > However, my impression is that the CIFS filesystem is deadlocking
> > somewhere...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# lsof -p 16327
> COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICESIZENODE NAME
> rsyn
16 matches
Mail list logo