Close list to outsider's posts?

2005-05-19 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Hi I'm assuming that Wayne is the obvious destination for this request. Can we make the mailing list reject emails from non-subscribers? This would drastically reduce the amount of spam we receive. Thanks, Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd. Have you backed up tod

Rsync 2.6.5pre2 released -- fixed links

2005-05-19 Thread Wayne Davison
I accidentally sent out the prior email with some of the links pointing to the pre1 release instead of pre2. Here are the corrected links for just the items that were wrong: To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre2-NEWS You can gr

Re: [rsync-announce] Rsync 2.6.5pre2 released

2005-05-19 Thread Michael
Not Found The requested URL /ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.5pre1-NEWS was not found on this server. > I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully > final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix > release to squash some annoying bugs that made it in

Re: Mysterious (bogus?) rsync(d) errors -- (code 23) at main.c(1045)

2005-05-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:46:02PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > IO error encountered - skipping file deletion Remember that the I/O error that it alludes to may have occurred at any point in the prior processing, including during the file-scan phase, or during the transfer phase, so be sure to look

Re: [rsync-announce] Rsync 2.6.5pre2 released (Out of Office)

2005-05-19 Thread Steve Doud
I am out of the office Thursday May 19th and Friday May 20th. Will return on Monday, May 23rd. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Rsync 2.6.5pre2 released

2005-05-19 Thread Wayne Davison
I have released rsync version 2.6.5pre2 -- the second (and hopefully final) pre-release for 2.6.5. The 2.6.5 release is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying bugs that made it into 2.6.4, though a few minor enhancements did make it in as well. To see all the changes since 2.6.4, go h

Re: Mysterious (bogus?) rsync(d) errors -- (code 23) at main.c(1045)

2005-05-19 Thread Josh Berkus
John, OK, here's the -vvv output. Everything is keen for a while. It's transferring 515 x 16MB files. Then: renaming pg_xlog/.00010046005D.gYONba to pg_xlog/00010046005D set modtime of pg_xlog/00010046005D to (1116531005) Thu May 19 12:30:05 2005 recv_fi

Out of Office AutoReply: Verbrechen der deutschen Frau

2005-05-19 Thread Sara D'Angelo
I will be out of the office Wednesday, May 18th, returning Tuesday, May 24th. I will not have access to email. If this is an emergency, please contact Nancy Marino at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or at 408-453-1522. Thank you. Sara D'Angelo Sponsorship and Promotions Associate American Musical Theatre of

Re: Mysterious (bogus?) rsync(d) errors -- (code 23) at main.c(1045)

2005-05-19 Thread Josh Berkus
Wayne, > > John, Wayne, > > > :-) Howdy, pardner... > Previously rsync was skipping the symlinks because you didn't specify > --links, so --safe-links had no effect. If you want it to transfer > symlinks as files, use -L (--copy-links). If you want it to duplicate > "safe" symlinks and copy

Re: Mysterious (bogus?) rsync(d) errors -- (code 23) at main.c(1045)

2005-05-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 09:15:01AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > John, Wayne, :-) Howdy, pardner... > Hmmm, if I do that, it transfers (and breaks) the symlinks. I want it to > leave them alone, with --safe-links appears to do. Previously rsync was skipping the symlinks because you didn't spec

Re: Mysterious (bogus?) rsync(d) errors -- (code 23) at main.c(1045)

2005-05-19 Thread Josh Berkus
John, Wayne, > It looks OK, so I can't explain the 'chown' errors. They're already the > same so it shouldn't be trying to chown the target "." in the first place. > This is an attempt to set the group (when not running as root) of the > base directory (you get two of them because of the post-pr

Re: -x option inoperative with "bind" mounts

2005-05-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:59:25AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > If the need to exclude all mounts has come to the point of writing such > a script, maybe a new option should be added to rsync? -X ? (like a big > serious X :-) As mentioned in the script, the newest rsync supports absolute

Re: Bug#305932: rsync on a directory transfers the files of this directory

2005-05-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:04:23AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > --files-from transferring the contents of a dir (i.e. including the > files in it) specified in the input, even though the files aren't > listed in the input. That's as intended, since a trailing slash means "the contents of the dire

Re: easiest way to do incrimentals?

2005-05-19 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 18 May 2005, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > > What I've been wondering is whether --fuzzy will also work with > > --link-dest, i.e. hard-link to files whose names are slightly > > different but are the same for other purposes > > Fuzz

Re: Bug#305932: rsync on a directory transfers the files of this directory

2005-05-19 Thread Paul Slootman
Hi, I got the following report from a Debian user, about --files-from transferring the contents of a dir (i.e. including the files in it) specified in the input, even thugh the files aren't listed in the input. This happens only when the dir name ends with a slash. I asked him to cook up a script