https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Like nifteaux (nifto) man, all I did was change the sleep time and I
get different results:
$ touch u; sleep 0;touch v; chmod 0 v; rsync u v; ls -og u v; /bin/rm -f u v
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 2005-04-25 00:05 u
-- 1 0 2005-04-25 00:05 v
$ touch u; sleep 1;touch v; chmod 0 v; rsync u v; ls -og u
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-24 14:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=1169)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1169&action=view)
Fix problem where receiver was not properly handling --one-file-syst
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-24 14:27 ---
Spent more time looking at this.
It looks like generator.c:delete_in_dir() does check one_file_system initialize
filesystem_dev appropriately.
However, nothing uses it
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-24 11:36 ---
It looks like the culprit is the change for receiver.c 1.130. It pulled the
call to send_file_list(-1,...), which is what handled the one_file_system code.
It's not li
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
Summary: --one-file-system semantics changed with 2.6.4 (bug?)
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
