listas de e-mails divididas por estados

2005-04-18 Thread milenajbd_g5a
E-mails segmentados para divulgação - Cadastros de e-mail listas de e-mails por classe social E-mails segmentados para divulgação - Cadastros de e-mail MALA DIRETA CADASTROS DE E-MAILS: http://www.gueb.de/segmails MALA DIRETA CADASTROS DE E-MAILS listas de e-mails divididas por estados listas

Re: Spam to this list

2005-04-18 Thread Shachar Shemesh
John E. Malmberg wrote: The essential SMTP NACK is not what is the problem as long as it is done during the SMTP connection using reject codes. Issuing a SMTP reject code for undeliverable messages will never cause a spamcop.net listing. Reject codes were very common once. Then they were recomm

Re: Spam to this list

2005-04-18 Thread John E. Malmberg
Shachar Shemesh wrote: John E. Malmberg wrote: The I.P. address is listed in bl.spamcop.net as hitting spamtraps. Just so you know, spamcop view bounces as spam. According to them, you should never send bounces. I think you will find a large amount of mail server administrators agree with that, e

Re: Spam to this list

2005-04-18 Thread Paul Slootman
Continuing this off-topic issue: On Mon 18 Apr 2005, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > John E. Malmberg wrote: > > >The I.P. address is listed in bl.spamcop.net as hitting spamtraps. > > Just so you know, spamcop view bounces as spam. According to them, you > should never send bounces. I believe the rig

Re: Spam to this list

2005-04-18 Thread Shachar Shemesh
John E. Malmberg wrote: The I.P. address is listed in bl.spamcop.net as hitting spamtraps. Just so you know, spamcop view bounces as spam. According to them, you should never send bounces. I believe the right approach is to convince admins to drop spamcop from their RBL list, rather than remove t