E-mails segmentados para divulgação - Cadastros de e-mail listas de e-mails por
classe social E-mails segmentados para divulgação - Cadastros de e-mail MALA
DIRETA CADASTROS DE E-MAILS:
http://www.gueb.de/segmails
MALA DIRETA CADASTROS DE E-MAILS listas de e-mails divididas por estados listas
John E. Malmberg wrote:
The essential SMTP NACK is not what is the problem as long as it is
done during the SMTP connection using reject codes. Issuing a SMTP
reject code for undeliverable messages will never cause a spamcop.net
listing.
Reject codes were very common once. Then they were recomm
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
John E. Malmberg wrote:
The I.P. address is listed in bl.spamcop.net as hitting spamtraps.
Just so you know, spamcop view bounces as spam. According to them, you
should never send bounces.
I think you will find a large amount of mail server administrators agree
with that, e
Continuing this off-topic issue:
On Mon 18 Apr 2005, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
> >The I.P. address is listed in bl.spamcop.net as hitting spamtraps.
>
> Just so you know, spamcop view bounces as spam. According to them, you
> should never send bounces. I believe the rig
John E. Malmberg wrote:
The I.P. address is listed in bl.spamcop.net as hitting spamtraps.
Just so you know, spamcop view bounces as spam. According to them, you
should never send bounces. I believe the right approach is to convince
admins to drop spamcop from their RBL list, rather than remove t