Interesting ideas.
> I envision the "VFS Change Logger" as a (hopefully very thin) middle-ware
> that sits between the kernel's VFS interfaces and a real filesystem, like
> ext3, reiser, etc. The "VFS Change Logger" will pass VFS calls to the
> underlying filesystem driver, but it will make note
Lester Hightower wrote:
I envision the "VFS Change Logger" as a (hopefully very thin) middle-ware
that sits between the kernel's VFS interfaces and a real filesystem, like
ext3, reiser, etc. The "VFS Change Logger" will pass VFS calls to the
underlying filesystem driver, but it will make note of c
This is only my second email to the rsync mailing list. My first was sent
under the title "Re: TODO hardlink performance optimizations" on Jan 3,
2004. The response of the rsync developers to that email was remarkable
(in my opinion). I felt that the rsync performance enhancements that
resulted
I did what steve suggested here, on both machines. I didn't use any
arguments for configure... just did ./configure
rsync -Caupvvvz server::myfiles /usr/mydir
Here's what happens when it gets to the one file that it says is too
big:
pathto/myfile
recv mapped pathto/myfile of size 1073741312
rsy
On Apr 12, 2005 10:04 AM, Jeff Schoby wrote:
> How do I build rsync for large file support..I'm going to need > 4GB
> files thru rsync.
>
> It basically stops with an error message of "File too large"...I can
> re-run rsync later with the -vvv flag and post the results tomorrow.
It sounds like yo
How do I build rsync for large file support..I'm going to need > 4GB
files thru rsync.
It basically stops with an error message of "File too large"...I can
re-run rsync later with the -vvv flag and post the results tomorrow.
>>> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/12/05 11:36 AM >>>
On Tue 12
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:46:55PM -0400, Christophe Kalt wrote:
> FWIW, I just upgraded to 2.6.4, and that has solved a problem
> i'd been having for a few weeks where 2.6.3 repeatedly failed
> to synchronize a 5GB file. Don't remember seeing anything in
> the NEWS or other making me think upgrad
On Tue 12 Apr 2005, Christophe Kalt wrote:
>
> FWIW, I just upgraded to 2.6.4, and that has solved a problem
> i'd been having for a few weeks where 2.6.3 repeatedly failed
> to synchronize a 5GB file. Don't remember seeing anything in
> the NEWS or other making me think upgrading would help, but
On Apr 12, Jeff Schoby wrote:
| What the maximum filesize rsync can transfer?
Depends on whether you have LFS (large file support) enabled
(at compile time).
| I'm trying to rsync one of my servers to another but the rsync is
| croaking on a file that's barely 1GB.
That should be no problem.
On Tue 12 Apr 2005, Jeff Schoby wrote:
> What the maximum filesize rsync can transfer?
2GB (4GB?) should always be possible, when built with the appropriate
options for large file support >4GB files are no problem.
> I'm trying to rsync one of my servers to another but the rsync is
> croaking on
What the maximum filesize rsync can transfer?
I'm trying to rsync one of my servers to another but the rsync is
croaking on a file that's barely 1GB.
Tips, hints, suggestions?
rsync server is AIX 4.3.3 ML11 - rsync 2.6.3
rsync client is AIX 5.3 ML1 - rsync 2.6.4
Thanks
-Jeff
--
Jeff Schoby
I'm running cwrync :
rsync version 2.6.4 protocol version 29
on a Windows 2000 sp4 PC and I'm trying to rsync my favourites from my home PC
to this Win2K machine. I run a batch file on this win2K machine.
99.99% of these .url files are transfered correctly.
But the odd one doesn't get transf
Hi,
I've got two linux servers with a slow connection between them. One each
server, there is a samba running with some local users. I want to have an
identical copy of that shared folder on both servers. Is there a chance that
after any samba user changes a file, samba server will start rsyn
13 matches
Mail list logo
