On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:31:53PM +, Toby D. Watson wrote:
> These files are not actually deleted as they are then transferred back
> in the sync process.
Do the names of these files differ in case, even after the transfer?
Are there any weird characters in the filenames that might be transla
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:14:51PM -0800, Steve Traugott wrote:
> Do you mean just set f_out to batch_fd at the right time in
> send_files, then set it back before protocol shutdown?
Almost. I was thinking of just added an extra variable, f_xfer, that
would either have the f_out value in it or th
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 05:41:40PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:16:17PM -0800, Steve Traugott wrote:
> > And then writefd() would need to be toggled from there to write to the
> > correct fd...
>
> On the receiving side, everything that is read from the sender is
> alre
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:16:17PM -0800, Steve Traugott wrote:
> And then writefd() would need to be toggled from there to write to the
> correct fd...
On the receiving side, everything that is read from the sender is
already sent to the batch file, so I think the only thing necessary is
to have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] report_log]# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 2068172 8762961191876 0 76796 654944
-/+ buffers/cache: 1445561923616
Swap: 1020116 01020116
No swap in use... however, keep
Sounds like you're swapping -- what does free memory look like?
Steve
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:24:51PM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> I've set up a 1GB tmpfs filesystem on a system with a single IDE disk and
> 2GB's of memory. I'm storing a large amount of RRD files (~300MB) on the
> tmpfs fil
I've set up a 1GB tmpfs filesystem on a system with a single IDE disk and
2GB's of memory. I'm storing a large amount of RRD files (~300MB) on the
tmpfs filesystem to make their generation a bit speedier... this part works
great.
However, I want to rsync these files over from time to time to a di
Hi Wayne, Jos, Chris, All,
Before diving into answers to Wayne, I have to ask (out of due diligence
if nothing else): Are we past the point of being able to change the
behavior of --write-batch itself, such that it *only* writes the
batch file, and doesn't change the destination? That would make
I see and it makes sense to optimise the file transfer process, but in
carrying on with a transfer when the temporary file cannot be created can
(in our case) result in quite a large amount of data being transferred
over the network (we have more than a few files in the 6-8GB range) which
is not op
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:46:20PM -0800, Steve Traugott wrote:
> Here's an rsync patch which adds an --offline flag, letting you
> transfer changed blocks via removable media, while still comparing
> checksums via the net.
I'd prefer a different option name for this. Some folks have suggested
co
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:27:57PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> The Documentation section of the rsync web site has a "How Rsync Works" page:
>
> http://rsync.samba.org/how-rsync-works.html
>
> originally written by the late JW Schultz.
>
> In the pipeline section you'll see that communicati
11 matches
Mail list logo
