Hi all-
My test results so far indicate a pretty decent improvement in overall rsync
performance when using a slightly more sophisticated checksum calculation.
The attached patch has the required changes (in hindsight, I should have
compressed this using zlib with the new algorithm :-) ).
Some
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2357
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:20:57PM -0600, Chris McKeever wrote:
> so the chain goes
>
> hardlink a mirror directory to a new folder
> rsync live data to a mirror directory
> deleted files between the mirror/live data are then persistant in the
> hardlinked daily directories
Doing this can tweak t
RSync-
Sorry about that. I accidentally
reversed the default values I had specified
for the window size and the reset block size.
This only effects the outcome if you accept
all default values, and don't initialize
with your own.
The correct default values in the deflate.c
file (line
at 17.02.2005 2:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the following hint at:
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/#Incremental
mv backup.0 backup.1
rsync -a --delete --link-dest=../backup.1 source_directory/ backup.0/
I simply want to maintain a dated backup of a server so that I could
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:02:07 -0800, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:24:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It seems that this method would not use terribly much space in terms of
> > duplicating files, however I am not sure of the --delete portion
>
> In
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2357
Summary: error when compiling rsync under Windows Services for
Unix
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2357
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-17 11:09 ---
What I meant to ask was, can this be automatically determined somehow so other
users of Windows Services for Unix don't have to hack flist.c like I did?
--
Configure b
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:24:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems that this method would not use terribly much space in terms of
> duplicating files, however I am not sure of the --delete portion
In your command sequence, you are (properly) moving the existing
hierarchy of files out o
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:20:53 +0100, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed 16 Feb 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I simply want to maintain a dated backup of a server so that I could
> > always go back to a certain date. I would like to keep this structure
> > for each day for th
Title: Message
Hi,
We have developed a backup software by using rsync which syncs the data between
Windows (mainly Win2k ) machine and Linux machine.
For Windows, we are
using CYGWIN rsync software version 2.6.2 and for Linux, we are using rsync
software version 2.6.3.
It takes ar
On Wed 16 Feb 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I simply want to maintain a dated backup of a server so that I could
> always go back to a certain date. I would like to keep this structure
> for each day for the last seven days, then one weekly snapshot for each
> week in the month and then e
12 matches
Mail list logo
