Re: Rsync friendly zlib/gzip compression - revisited

Kevin Day wrote: At that point, I started to consider the question raised in the discussion threads by Kevin Easton - primarily: are the checksum and compression block trigger selected by Rusty optimal? Oh, come on, Kevin. Couldn't you have sent this email just one week ago, before I started t

[Bug 1455] Make -x skip a "bind" mount point to the same filesystem

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-13 22:24 --- Note that the --fuzzy patch has made it into the CVS version. It only looks for renamed files in the same directory as the file being created, though, so it is not a fu

[Bug 2218] inplace-if-low-disk

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2218 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2130] suppressing progress bar when not the foreground process

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 1477] error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(836)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1477 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2216] remote dies, local hangs when disk full

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

NOTE for users of the CVS version of rsync

A NOTE to anyone who is testing out the CVS version of rsync (including those using the "nightly" snapshots of the CVS source): Be aware that a change is about to be checked into CVS that will change the sort order of the file list for protocol 29. If you have installed one of these development v

Re: #include missing for 64 bit integers.

Wayne Davison wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 10:07:05PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: Rsync is not including this file, nor is there a feature test for this header file in the configure phase, but rsync is using [int64 and uint64]. Rsync is defining its own int64 (using a define, not a typedef),

Re: macro feature tests in rsync code

Wayne Davison wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:53:28PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote: I don't see this. All the code in CVS uses "#if" to test the value of HAVE_SOCKETPAIR. I found the problem, one of the bugs in my first experimental pthreads version is that it sometimes creates a file with t