On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:40:20AM -0800, jediknight2 wrote:
> Is there a way for RSYNC when its backing up a folder say c:\output to
> ignore certain file extentions as a whole...so basically ignore all other
> files EXCEPT *.gpg files?
You can exclude all files except *.gpg files from the transf
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 10:07:05PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Rsync is not including this file, nor is there a feature test for this
> header file in the configure phase, but rsync is using [int64 and
> uint64].
Rsync is defining its own int64 (using a define, not a typedef), so it
is not d
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:53:28PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> The tests in rsync for features have been changed to testing the value
> of a macro definition instead of previously testing if the macro was
> defined.
Acutally, the various tests were sometimes inconsistent -- some were
testin
John E. Malmberg wrote:
The Open Group Single Unix standard shows that the data types int64 and
uint64 are defined in the inttypes.h header file.
Rsync is not including this file, nor is there a feature test for this
header file in the configure phase, but rsync is using these data types.
My err
The Open Group Single Unix standard shows that the data types int64 and
uint64 are defined in the inttypes.h header file.
Rsync is not including this file, nor is there a feature test for this
header file in the configure phase, but rsync is using these data types.
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perso
The tests in rsync for features have been changed to testing the value
of a macro definition instead of previously testing if the macro was
defined.
This testing is now inconsistent with the HAVE_SOCKETPAIR macro, where
in some places it is tested to see if the macro is defined, and other
plac
Hi, all -
I've been digging into the question of using rsync to sync up compressed data,
and read with interest the conversations regarding the rsync friendly patch
available for gzip (I belive Rusty provided this patch). For anyone
interested, the message thread is archived at
http://lists.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2256
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1889
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-12 15:05 ---
Note that in the new version, this too-long receiver-side scan can be avoided by
using --delete-during (--del). However, I'm still considering adding a "keep
alive" mes
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority|P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1673
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
i really need help with my computer. my computer says a file is missing from my computer and i don't know what to do after that. can you help me?
sincerely, val d.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.--
To unsubscribe or chang
14 matches
Mail list logo
