On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:57:30PM -0500, Gil Naveh wrote:
> I type rsync -a e ServerB/... I get a prompt for #password:
> I tried rsync with the option --password-file=/name/of/file/with/password
> but it still asked me for password!
As the manpage states (though probably not as well as it should
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:36:51AM +, Alun wrote:
> If you're synchronising log files, for example, then you may be able
> to guarantee that all changes to the file happen at the end of it.
> Unfortunately, rsync doesn't give you the opportunity to use this
> extra information to save I/O and b
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:08:45AM +, Alun wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > If the log file is e.g. 2Gbytes long and has only had 100Kbytes appended
> > > since the last rsync, then using --whole-file means 2GBytes of network
>
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 07:38 ---
> Hmm. I've not managed to make it break. I will try "loading" the machines
> while doing the rsyncs and see if that has any effect.
Well. It seems to have no effect
On Thu 10 Feb 2005, Gil Naveh wrote:
>
> The --rsync-path=PATH did the work. :)
> Is there a doc that shows all the options that comes with rsync? - when I
> tried #rsync --help
> I did not get the --rsync-path option.
Hmm, my copy does show that... (2.6.3)
However, the man page is the usual loca
Chris Shoemaker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > If the log file is e.g. 2Gbytes long and has only had 100Kbytes appended
> > since the last rsync, then using --whole-file means 2GBytes of network
> > traffic and 2GBytes of disk I/O at either end. Using the check
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 01:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I havn't specified the timeout option, and still get the issue.
>
> I also have double-checked, and reliably suceeed on all the 'straced' bac
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 01:58 ---
I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer
unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which
is really annoyi
