Hi. I work at an online content provider. We have magazine articles in
thousands of files stored on our servers. Files are added to the
repository on a regular basis. I use rsync extensively (thank you to
the authors) to periodically copy newly added files to my local copy of
the repository for
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1433
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1764
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
There is a new patch named "delete-during.diff" in the CVS "patches"
dir. This patch adds the ability for rsync to incrementally delete
files in each directory during the normal course of the transfer rather
than doing a separate delete scan either before or after the transfer.
The patch renames t
Hello.
How much would this help with rsync, over a 10,000 mi. , high bandwidth,
dedicated leased line?
I note that NetEx lists rsync as a 'tested' application.
Does anyone here have experience with NetEx HyperIP ?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/lis
Wayne wrote regarding 'Re: excluding based on filesystem?' on Wed, Jan 19 at
17:37:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:09:32PM -0600, Danny Sauer wrote:
> > Perhaps that should be amended to mention that this only happens when
> > the pattern doesn't start with a '/'?
>
> No, the matching you cited doe
On Fri 03 Dec 2004, Brandon Knitter wrote:
>
> rsync 2.5.7
> linux RHES v3
>
> We need to sync over 4 Million files, and when we run rsync we run out of
> memory! :(
Try the latest version, there have been improvements in memory
efficiency since 2.5.7.
Paul Slootman
--
To unsubscribe or chang
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:54:20AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> (Note to Wayne - isn't it dangerous to assume that off_t is 64 bits?
Yeah, it probably is -- that code was always a kluge that doesn't really
get used. I looked around at the rest of the rsync code, and it looks
to me like the vari
