Need
Oxycontin
Vicodin es
Oxycodone
http://iqh.kabet.com/p/sales/xduzjc
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Do you want
Oxycontin
V1cod1n
0xyc0d0ne
http://mho.kabet.com/ph/sales/xxnumj
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:51:23AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> > In the past I could say smt. like:
> >
> > rsync -a dir1/ dir2/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/remote-dir/
> >
> > and it would process first dir1 and then dir2.
>
> The filenames read in from dir
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:31:38PM -0800, d c wrote:
> As an adder- Would I be better of not compressing?
Yes -- it allows the unchanged data to actually match (compressed files
don't have large sections of matching data between versions). You could
use the -z option to send the data compressed
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:51:23AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> In the past I could say smt. like:
>
> rsync -a dir1/ dir2/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/remote-dir/
>
> and it would process first dir1 and then dir2.
The filenames read in from dir1 and dir2 have always been sorted into a
single list of
As an adder- Would I be better of not compressing?d c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm---
Let me clarify a few things and apply it to your response to verify I understand.
I have 51 file ranging from 1mb to 1.9gb in size. These files reside on a share of a windows server. They are the result
Hmm---
Let me clarify a few things and apply it to your response to verify I understand.
I have 51 file ranging from 1mb to 1.9gb in size. These files reside on a share of a windows server. They are the result of an export from VMWare's ESX server.
I hooked up a usb drive to the windows box
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:39:19PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> > With newer rsyncs, rsync seems to sort the transaction set, so I
> > cannot longer use this trick to have the metadata uploaded just after
> > the data in the same transaction set.
>
> Rsync
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 04:40:03PM -0800, d c wrote:
> The source files have slightly chnaged and I now am trying to sync
> them. However, it seems that rsync has to copy the entire file
> itself the first time inorder to build the index (hash) needed in
> order to have more efficient transfers i
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:39:19PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> With newer rsyncs, rsync seems to sort the transaction set, so I
> cannot longer use this trick to have the metadata uploaded just after
> the data in the same transaction set.
Rsync has always sorted the list of files to be sent, so th
hi,
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, d c wrote:
> I am trying to use rsync to synchronize very large files- some are close to
> 2gb in size.
> I have copied the files manually to a usb drive and shipped it to the
> location where the rsync server is running.
> At the remote location I copied the files to
Hi All-
I am trying to use rsync to synchronize very large files- some are close to 2gb in size.
I have copied the files manually to a usb drive and shipped it to the location where the rsync server is running.
At the remote location I copied the files to a directory which resides on the r
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Steve Bonds wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:39:19 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers dag-at-wieers.com wrote:
>
> > There are other ways to work around it, either by uploading in different
> > steps (which is impractical in my scenario) or by using a staging area
> > (which is impossible a
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:39:19 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers dag-at-wieers.com wrote:
> Apparently a change of behaviour from rsync 2.5 to rsync 2.6 affected the
> way I worked. I provide RPM repositories that I mirror using rsync. It is
> important to have the repository meta-data in sync with the data ot
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:55:01AM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> Since the problem is that Darwin has no lchown function implemented,
> for portability, this if statement could be:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_LCHOWN
> if (change_uid || change_gid) {
> #else
> if (!S_ISLNK(st->st_mode) && (cha
Hi,
Apparently a change of behaviour from rsync 2.5 to rsync 2.6 affected the
way I worked. I provide RPM repositories that I mirror using rsync. It is
important to have the repository meta-data in sync with the data otherwise
people have errors using Yum or Apt.
In the old days (with older rs
I would like to know if someone know the syntax while calling the
server. I have seen that rsync uses ssh to launch rsync in server mode
with parameters like this :
rsync --server --sender . /files_needed
However, this syntax isn't documented anywhere. What is the aim of the
'.' before the path
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2208
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-03 03:42 ---
Server side (other end of connection) went away more than 9 minutes later
than client, so server do not close TCP connection (it remains open until
server timeout - test
18 matches
Mail list logo
