Hello list,
I'm posting some info here hoping it might help some others. I searched
around a bit before I guessed (correctly) at the cause of my problem.
I'm currently using cwrsync (rsync 2.6.2) to backup data from a Windows
XP machine to a Windows 2000 machine. Unfortunately the boss won't let
"jim" writes:
> Thanks for the additional info.
>
> I actually have tried the --no-blocking-io option, but the sync
> still hung.
>
> Since no one on Unix-like platforms are reporting an issue, do you
> think it may be something in the Cygwin compatibility layer?
Yes, I think so. When I tried t
First, Thanks for all your help Wayne. This doesn't appear to be an rsync
problem at all.
OK here is what I am seeing. Here is the backtrace
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4000734c in open_path () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 0x40004eed in _dl_map_object () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#2 0x4011b114 in dl_open_worke
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1873
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 17:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=702)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=702&action=view)
Re-enable "!"s in .cvsignore files
I had thought that the bang token
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1873
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1873
Summary: rsync doesn't obey .cvsignore (exclamation) ! semantics
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Thanks for the additional info.
I actually have tried the --no-blocking-io option, but the sync still hung.
Since no one on Unix-like platforms are reporting an issue, do you think it may be
something in the Cygwin compatibility layer?
Interestingly (to me anyway,) is that I have encountered th
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 01:02:57PM -0500, Joe Eiler wrote:
> I have been doing a "rsync -av localhost::" to see if a daemon is
> running, is this a valid test?
Yes, that should return a connection-refused error if rsync isn't
running.
> The core file is about 680k, I am going to attempt to crack
I believe that first one is because I already had a daemon running. Since I
saw that I have been doing a ps -ef | grep rsync to make sure they are all
dead before testing.
I have been doing a "rsync -av localhost::" to see if a daemon is running,
is this a valid test?
I did do a "strace -f rsyn
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:07:17AM -0700, jim wrote:
> Can you explain to me the relationship between the parent rsync
> process and it's children?
Rsync has a separate process for each major function.
The generator process (on the receiving side) has the job of figuring
out which files are diffe
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:29:03AM -0500, Joe Eiler wrote:
> Oct 5 06:06:12 localhost rsyncd[22781]: rsyncd version 2.6.3 starting, listening on
> port 873
> Oct 5 06:06:12 localhost rsyncd[22781]: unable to bind any inbound sockets on port
> 873
> Oct 5 06:06:12 localhost rsyncd[22781]: rsync
Hi folks,
we would like your feedback on a new option we have implemented. We
would like to know whether it should be merged into the CVS
tree. Perhaps one of the rsync developers can have a look at the code,
improve it where necessary, and committ it to CVS.
The name of the option is "--delete-
OK, I did some more poking around and it is actually the read command that
is failing(well, returning EOF)
I put a couple print statements in and everything is identical until the
failure. Can anyone give me a hint of how to go about debugging this
further?
Snip from Failing case (group as nobod
Hi,
I really need to get the bottom of this problem. I have now experienced the hang while
synching two local directories.
Can you explain to me the relationship between the parent rsync process and it's
children?
At the time of the latest hang, there two children rsync processes. Why not use a
Thanks for the response Wayne.
Here are the results of my tests based on your comments, I added some extra
carriage returns to hopefully make it easier to read.
The logs are at the bottom. A 'ps -ef' shows rsync --daemon is still
running.
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /e
On Tue 05 Oct 2004, Jason Cox wrote:
> I have been having trouble with a Mandrake 10 Server.
> When I copy from one server to another I find that on completion of the
> Rsync command that the system still reports back that the memory is in use
When a process goes away, any memory that proce
Hello,
I have been having trouble with a Mandrake 10 Server.
When I copy from one server to another I find that on completion of the
Rsync command that the system still reports back that the memory is in use
( aprox 1 gig ). I have installed 1.5 gig of ram into the server and it made
no dif
17 matches
Mail list logo
