I'm 48, and I can't believe I'm having the best of my life now thanks to
cliallis Soft Tabs. The best part is no longer worrying about whether I'll be
hard. With this stuff, I am always stiff, without fail.
You have to experiment with the dosage and time lag.
I started with 20 mg (good to rev my en
I'm 48, and I can't believe I'm having the best of my life now thanks to
cliallis Soft Tabs. The best part is no longer worrying about whether I'll be
hard. With this stuff, I am always stiff, without fail.
You have to experiment with the dosage and time lag.
I started with 20 mg (good to rev my en
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I switched both ends back to 2.6.2 and started rsync in daemon
> mode by hand (no ssh). The sync is still in progress, but it looks
> like it is working.
I was wondering about your attempt to run an rsync daemon via ssh...
Your original info:
I switched both ends back to 2.6.2 and started rsync in daemon mode by hand (no ssh).
The sync is still in progress, but it looks like it is working. There were three small
problems, however:
2004/09/24 14:25:34 [1896] opendir "/17B - CONTROL/17Bx - xxx , xxx
x xxx-297 A24A-53A/
2.5.7 died the same way. Maybe the bug is in cygwin1.dll? I'm using 1005.11.0.0.
---Original Message---
> From: jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: rsync 2.6.2 crash
> Sent: 24 Sep 2004 12:22:17
>
> I tried 2.6.3pre2 on the server side, and it failed the sa
I tried 2.6.3pre2 on the server side, and it failed the same way. Is there a way to
build it so the stack dump has function names?
I will try the 2.5.x series to see if the problem is absent.
---Original Message---
> From: jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Re: rsync 2.6.2
OK, I will do that next. I just tried 2.6.1 on both ends, and it died in a similar
fashion.
---Original Message---
> From: Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rsync 2.6.2 crash
> Sent: 24 Sep 2004 11:21:51
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:09:26AM -0700, jim
Hi,
I'm using rsync/ssh/cygwin to sync two very large directory hierarchies. While testing
with one of the subdirectories (this subhierarchy has about 1000 subfolders and 17000
files), I experience the following behavior:
rsync 2.6.2 on both ends.
Client command:
rsync -v -v -r --delete -t --
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:03:42AM +0200, Jose Luis Poza wrote:
> "2004/09/22 13:30:40 [4880] cannot send long-named file
If the name overflows the MAXPATHLEN for the system, then a file of that
length cannot be referenced with a directory path of that length. You
may be able to work around the p
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 11:09:26AM -0700, jim wrote:
> The server crashed, but left rsync.exe.stackdump:
A stackdump would be useful if it would give function names and line
numbers. Without that, it doesn't give me anything I can use to figure
out where it crashed.
Could you try running 2.6.3pr
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1818
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hi,
I'm using rsync/ssh/cygwin to sync two very large directory hierarchies. While testing
with one of the subdirectories (this subhierarchy has about 1000 subfolders and 17000
files), I experience the following behavior:
rsync 2.6.2 on both ends.
Client command:
rsync -v -v -r --delete -t --
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:07:21PM +0200, Essyug wrote:
> I don't see anything like that, even with "strace -f".
Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight because getpwnam() is a library
routine, not a system call, so you'll see things like the open for
/etc/passwd that was caused by the call, but not the
I am truly enjoying my rebirth. No more excuses, no more frustration,
no more having to solely satisfy my girlfriend orally.
I just pop 10 mg, and before long, I am a sex machine.
Now that I can get rock-hard again, my girlfriend can enjoy her favorite position:
being on top, which is difficult fo
Does the client side send 11385 or "testuser"? Or both?
It sends both (it sends a mapping table of UID/name pairs before it
sends the UIDs attached to the file-info). The fact that your server
got the name but didn't change the UID to the right value indicates to
me that the getpwnam() call didn'
The --link-by-hash patch is a bit defective, I think.
If I run the following command:
rsync --link-by-hash=/tmp/hash 192.168.1.1::mirrors/ps1 /tmp
I get the following output:
(1) linkname = /tmp/hash/0fb9ca1a/3cc6ec7f5a2de3a0235b585f/0
link-by-hash (new): "/tmp/ps1" -> "/tmp/hash/0fb9ca1a/3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1818
Summary: Rsyncd refuses connection if reverse mapping fails
Product: rsync
Version: 2.5.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
One thing that the link-by-hash patch needs is an additional close();
without that, I quickly ran into "too many open files".
--- hashlink.c.old 2004-09-24 10:59:12.0 +0200
+++ hashlink.c 2004-09-24 10:59:20.0 +0200
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@
}
Hello,
I have a trouble
when rsync tries to tranfer a big size paths files, the log message is:
"2004/09/22 13:30:40 [4880] cannot send
long-named file "SHARED/Concursos/Correos y Telégrafos/Concurso Correos_Expdte.
AI04001_Sistema de admón. y validación de certif. y firmas digitales/CD
19 matches
Mail list logo
