[Bug 1793] configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 1793] configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-17 20:21 --- Rawhide glibc had a bug that prevented a lot of packages from compiling. Download the newer glibc (I'm using glibc-2.3.3-53) and things'll compile again. -- Config

[Bug 1678] --link-dest doesn't create hard links on remote system.

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-17 18:31 --- I suppose it might be good to note the bug as it relates to older rsyncs, but there's no problem specifying -o in a modern rsync (rsync just ignores -o if you're not roo

[Bug 1433] The --dry-run (-n) option doesn't report some directory changes

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1433 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|LATER

[Bug 1678] --link-dest doesn't create hard links on remote system.

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-17 17:23 --- Thanks for your explanation. Yes, it's true about the user IDs - they are accidentally the same on 2 systems, but not the third. Can I suggest that rsync might want to

[Bug 1793] configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-17 17:07 --- Attached are the files you suggested that I take a look at. Hope this helps. I've got a working rsync that I got from a .rpm. So, I think it can work. hmmm mybe the .

[Bug 1793] configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-17 17:02 --- Created an attachment (id=669) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=669&action=view) glob.h for fedora rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.sa

[Bug 1793] configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-17 17:00 --- Created an attachment (id=668) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=668&action=view) glob man page for fedora rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugz

[Bug 1764] dry-run does not show changes in owner / group, permission, or timestamp

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P4 |P5 --- Additional Comments From

[Bug 1793] configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments

[Bug 1670] softlink can't be excluded

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1670 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments

[Bug 1678] --link-dest doesn't create hard links on remote system.

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 1793] New: configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793 Summary: configure: WARNING: glob.h: present but cannot be compiled Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: norma

[Bug 1792] doing directory only rsync causes an rsync protocol error

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 1673] Verbose dry run doesn't report replacements of symlink with directory

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1673 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor Status|NEW

[Bug 1791] using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't delete files

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |trivial Status|NEW

[Bug 1792] New: doing directory only rsync causes an rsync protocol error

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792 Summary: doing directory only rsync causes an rsync protocol error Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor

[Bug 1791] New: using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't delete files

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791 Summary: using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't delete files Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severi

RSync on Win32

2004-09-17 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
The setup: File Server with Windows 2000 Server: shares multiple drives to a large network consisting of both Macs and PCs. Macs run OS9 and OSX. Backup Server with Windows 2003 Server: has Cygwin installed so I can use rsync (which is included with C

Re: Bug: in 2.6.1

2004-09-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:24:26PM +0100, Gordon Lack wrote: >Is there some way to get symlinks to replace non-empty directories > without using --delete? The --force option does this. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting

Re: Ownership

2004-09-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:29:41AM +0200, Essyug wrote: > Does the client side send 11385 or "testuser"? Or both? It sends both (it sends a mapping table of UID/name pairs before it sends the UIDs attached to the file-info). The fact that your server got the name but didn't change the UID to the

[Bug 1675] rsync cannot cope with literal IPv6 addresses

2004-09-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Bug: in 2.6.1

2004-09-17 Thread Gordon Lack
If, in a hierarchy which has been previously rsync()ed, I replace a non-empty directory with a symbolic link the rsync will fail. It does work if the original directory was empty. It also works if I specify --delete (presumably since that deletes first, so we end up with an empty directo

Re: Rsync diff mode (again)?

2004-09-17 Thread Dan Bolser
One thing I liked about rsync was that I could use it right away with only the rsync --help option. I will try to get unison going, or get going with unison. I wonder why I hate learning new things these days. Cheers, Dan. On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Wayne Davison wrote: >On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 07:4

Re: Ownership

2004-09-17 Thread Essyug
All I get running with - is the gid... That is because rsync doesn't believe that it is root. I think I should modify rsync so that it outputs the uid when it is the sender even when it is not root. What your output doesn't show is what the receiver thinks the uid is (which will show if it be