On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> > 5. I want to know If rsync Server is receiving the data of around 1
> > GB every day what is harware configuration recommended for the better
> > performance.
>
> We maintain just under 1TB per server with 20 or 30 backup targets and
> don't see th
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Swapnil wrote:
> 1. I want to know whether rsync server and client are available for
> * Novell servers
> * Windows 2003
> * Windows 2000 server
> * Windows NT
> * Windows XP
> * Xservers
> * Mac OS X
> * Mac OS 9
I am unaware
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 07:06:28PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 06:27:45PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > My initial reaction (having not actually read the code) is that it would
> > be desirable make the window_size highly composite, and then ensure that
> > the block s
Dear rsync Developers,
I am new user to rsync,
I have few queries please help me.
1. I want to know whether rsync server and client are available for
* Novell servers
* Windows 2003
* Windows 2000 server
* Windows NT
* Windows XP
* Xservers
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:07:36PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I did some work refining your patch a little, and liked the result so
> much I went ahead and checked it into CVS. I'd appreciate it if you
> could give my changes a look to see if I messed anything up.
>
> The most important chang
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:07:36PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I did some work refining your patch a little, and liked the result so
> much I went ahead and checked it into CVS. I'd appreciate it if you
> could give my changes a look to see if I messed anything up.
>
> The most important chang
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #543 is|0 |1
obsolete|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536
Summary: rsync aborts transferring files larger than 2 GB
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: PA-RISC
OS/Version: HP-UX
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529
Summary: 32bit rollover problem rsyncing files greater than 4GB
in size
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: n
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:21:05PM -0400, Sameer Kamat wrote:
> What would be the expected behaviour of rsync, synchronizing a file
> that is changing in size.
For a growing file, it would send however much data was in the file when
rsync checked its size. (For a shrinking file, the version of rs
I'm looking at using Rsync to synchronize 600 Windows servers across the country to a
central location. I'll be synchronizing about 15-20 gigs of data, but the vast
majority will never change... every now and then, we would have to add new files,
ranging in size from a few bytes to 1.5GB. Each
Hello,
What would be the expected behaviour of rsync, synchronizing a file
that is changing in size.
If I have a file ( say 100G ) that is being gzipped, and I start an rsync of
that file system to a remote
location, would rsync just send the data of that gzip file that exists on
disk at that
Hello
I'm trying to rsync some individual files, but it's not working:
rsync -lptgoD /etc/named.conf /disk2/etc/
It works well if /disk2/etc/ dir exists, but if only /disk2/
dir exists, it won't create the etc/ dir and put the file inside it.
Just gives an error:
mkstemp /mnt/disk2/etc/..wl2ljs
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:01:21PM -0400, Dan Pritts wrote:
> I'd suggest changing the last sentence to something like
>
> This is the default when both the source and target are filesystems
> (local or networked) mounted on the local machine.
Yeah, that could be made clearer. I just checked
late followup to this thread - i just had noted in the man page
that this was unclear and found this thread waiting on the
list for me when i came to catch up.
-W, --whole-file
With this option the incremental rsync algorithm is not used and
the whole file is sen
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 11:09:46PM +0200, Antti Tapaninen wrote:
> The attached patch gives the user ability to define how many symbolic
> links rsync should follow before actually adding it to the file list.
I was looking at this proposed patch and I had a couple questions:
What is the intended
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Pete Toscano wrote:
> rsync -e ssh --delete -rlptv /home/pete/updates/fedora/2/RPMS.updates/
> server:/usr/local/repository/fedora/2/RPMS.updates/
U, move along. Nothing to see here. :s
I realized that it was just user brain damage. I must of had an old
RPMS.updates
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:17:35AM -0600, Clinton East wrote:
> rsync -avvz /home/cje/mirror/ rsync://www.clintoneast.com:2/clinton
> opening connection using rsh rsync rsync --server -vvlogDtprz .
> "//www.clintoneast.com:2/clinton"
You don't mention what version of rsync you're running,
Hi,
I'm not sure what whether I have constitutes a bug, but here goes;
I have two scripts; one I use when my website is 'correct' and i need a copy on
my mirror, in which case, I start rsync like so;
rsync -avvz rsync://www.clintoneast.com:2/clinton /home/cje/mirror/
opening tcp connection
Hello all,
I keep all Fedora Core updates in a directory on my workstation. I use
rsync to replicate this directory over to one of our servers that runs
our internal apt repository. This has worked well for Red Hat Linux
7.3, Red Hat Linux 9, and Fedora Core 1, but there's something weird
happen
Hi,
I am trying to sync a staff directory NFS mounted on a Linux server which is
around 60 GB total size and syncing to another remote Linux server. Rsync
version is 2.6.2 on both machines. When I ran rsync for the first time, it
appeared to build the entire list within 5 minutes and after syncing
23 matches
Mail list logo
