Hi!
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Paula A. LeBlanc wrote:
> Rsync version 2.6.0 on a HP B.11.00
> Rsync version 2.4.6 on Solaris 8
Where you get this version? self compiled?
I tried rsync2.6.0 compiled with gcc and the ansi cc from hp,
and it crash in daemon mode.
Have you tried 2.6.2?
I use the rsync 2
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 09:50:22AM +0100, Stuart Halliday wrote:
> > Logically, this is correct behaviour, I think.
> >
> > dump/* is a wildcard that matches every _existing_ local file in the
> > dump/ directory. Since the file you deleted doesn't exist, it isn't
> > considered by rsync.
> >
>
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-18 14:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=543)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=543&action=view)
Suggested patch from Craig Barratt
Wallace Matthews confirmed that th
I applied your patch and it has resolved the problem.
Thanks Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig Barratt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:48 PM
To: Wallace Matthews
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug 1463] New: poor performance with large
I'm glad. I remember a brief debate about it, and I thought that my side
lost. It always seemed to me that it should go on a case-by-case basis,
rather than assuming that NFS over gigabit was slower than ssh over
dialup.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
d
Thanks Wayne. That resulted in a successful execution.
I can now go work out my rsh issue.
wally
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Davison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 1:55 PM
To: Wallace Matthews
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: possible writefd_unbuffered error;
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:44:29PM -0400, Wallace Matthews wrote:
> I have tried the command with and without -acvv --rsh --stats and it always fails
> with the same message
You most definitely need -ac, though I think that -vv, --rsh, and
--stats may well be optional (you can test that). If you
I am trying to execute rsync manually at a "remote" server to test out --read-batch
execution.
I created the batch files on another server and then rcp'ed them to the "remote"
server. I had some issues of not having the
correct working directory on the remote system when I did an rsh "remote" rs
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:09:46PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I hope you have the time to review this patch and comment.
The patch looks good on first inspection. I don't like the change to
the whole-file default, though -- I'd prefer rsync to not force the
--whole-file option in batch mode
Hi,
I'm adapting the first script (backup to a central backup server with 7 day
incremental) from http://samba.anu.edu.au/rsync/examples.html web site
and ported it to Windows XP, as I need to save my files incrementally over
a week.
Script (Windows XP):
C:\rsync2>rsync --force --delete --back
As you say, it does "delete files that don't exist on the sending side"
and I can see why the behaviour looks wrong at first glance
The difference between dump/* and dump/ is the list of files you are
giving to rsync in the first place.
With dump/*:
For each file in dump/, do {
Comapre
> - on Windows platform, I did find a light version of rsync
>composed only of (rsync.exe, ssh.exe, rsetup.bat, cygwin1.dll)
> that works find as you can see but it is an 2.5.1-dev .
> I didn't find a newer version.
Windows cwrsync is V2.6.2
Do a google on cwrsync
--
To unsubscribe
> Logically, this is correct behaviour, I think.
>
> dump/* is a wildcard that matches every _existing_ local file in the
> dump/ directory. Since the file you deleted doesn't exist, it isn't
> considered by rsync.
>
> dump/ tells rsync to compare the contents of the local dump/ directory
> w
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:51:42PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I notice that appends to text files results in the whole file being
transferred (as recorded by 'Total bytes written') rather than just
the 9 characters I append to the file.
I assume you're doing a local-only tran
Tim Conway wrote:
Use "-a" unless there's a reason you need to retain different permissions,
owners, etc..
Okay - Thanks
I don't know the nature of your filesystems, but I have a guess... on at
least one end is a network filesystem - NFS, SMB, NCP, AFS, something like
that.
I was actually t
Thanks a lot ,
This explains a lot ("--backup-dir is on the remote).
I should have guest, sorry about this.
But about the fact that it is an old version, your right but :
- on Linux I tried to install the latest version 2.6.2, but the
"configure"command did never succeed :(, some problems
about
16 matches
Mail list logo