This is the case
- mounted Inetpub's windows-webserver on /mnt/web1 /mnt/web2, etc.
- rsync this to local dir:
rsync -av --delete /mnt/web1 /mass/kuurne/day
rsync -av --delete /mnt/web2 /mass/kuurne/day
etc..
- when logged in, everything works (I do see some errors about
no
Hi Again,
On Thu, 27 May 2004 at 09:52, Dan Goodes wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> For some time, we've been having some issues with our mirroring with
> rsync. The symptoms are a broken transfer, with the 'cryptic' error
> message:
>
> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (1128806 bytes read so far)
Fo
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:10:38PM -0400, Patrick Larkin wrote:
> rsync --daemon
> To which I got no error messages.
You'll need to check to see if the daemon is really running, and if not,
check the log file (e.g. syslog) to see why not (the above command exits
without a visible error no ma
I'm sorry. I wrote the message incorrectly. I have the configured
rsyncd.conf file on the receiving machine.
On Jun 2, 2004, at 4:10 PM, Patrick Larkin wrote:
Hello -
I am attempting to test rsync on a series of 8 MacOS X servers. On my
initial test, I configured one machine as the "sender" a
Hello -
I am attempting to test rsync on a series of 8 MacOS X servers. On my
initial test, I configured one machine as the "sender" and one machine
to "receive."
On the "sending" machine, I created an rsyncd.conf file. On the
"receiving" machine, I issued the command
rsync --daemon
Oh, of course. I just meant I've never needed it, and the original
question was raising an unnecessary application of it, not that the
function is useless.
Tim Conway
Unix System Administration
Contractor - IBM Global Services
desk:3032734776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the main use i've found for the
I have been following this thread.
I am working on rsync for an embedded application, but it has nothing to do with
program loading.
Donovan recently provided some formulas on figuring out the required checksum size
relative to file size and acceptable failure rate.
In the formulas, he assum
G'day,
From: "Greger Cronquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> >compiled binaries are often very different for only minor source
> >changes. It would be worth analysing your data to see if there are more
[...]
> Is that really true---that the binaries differ that much? Isn't that
> mostly due to relo
Thanks a million for rsync!
Sincerely,
Jeff Croft
jdcroft at best.com
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Donovan Baarda wrote:
The algorithm sacrifices CPU to minimise data transfer when updating it.
For it to be worth it, you must already have similar data that needs
updating, and data transfer must be expensive relative to CPU.
Often with embedded systems you are loading programs from scratch, so
th
10 matches
Mail list logo