batch-mode fixes [was: [PATCH] fix read-batch SEGFAULT]

2004-05-07 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 02:29:12AM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > > Status update: I've just finished tracing through the client behavior > > related to the apparent hang. All seems to go well with client/server > > negotiation, until the client tries to receive the file list (calling > > recv_fi

@ERROR: auth failed on module -- PROBLEM SOLVED!

2004-05-07 Thread Jonathan Johnson
The man page for rsync(1) states: --password-file This option allows you to provide a password in a file for accessing a remote rsync server. Note that this option is only useful when accessing an rsync server using the built

Re: exclude files with ~

2004-05-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 04:21:00PM +0200, Thorsten Schacht wrote: > How can I exclude files that have a ~ as last character? Use the --exclude='*~' option to rsync. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.

Re: rsync-2.6.2: NFS clients confused after an rsync [PATCH included]

2004-05-07 Thread Brian Childs
As a response to my original post, here's a patch that implements my proposed solution. I've tested it, and it fixes the problem, but I'm afraid there may be some hidden consequences of doing this. If anyone can think of anything, please let me know. Thanks, Brian --- rsync-2.6.2/util.c.orig

exclude files with ~

2004-05-07 Thread Thorsten Schacht
Hi, How can I exclude files that have a ~ as last character? Best, Thorsten Schacht IT-Dept. * TC Works Soft- & Hardware GmbH * email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] fon: +49 40 53 10 83 0 fax: +49 40 53 10 83 1 http://www.tcelectronic.com/ Flugha

Re: [PATCH] fix read-batch SEGFAULT [WAS: --write-batch just hangs?]

2004-05-07 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 06:26:15PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:34:29PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:14:22PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > > > Just so I'm on the right page, AFAICT, batch mode doesn't work _at all_. > > > > If that's the