Holy cow! Now that's a blast from the past. The thread started two years
ago... at least, the one he included part of. Since then, I lost that
job, spent 14 months unemployed, and got into a new job.
Anyway: your set of options is an almost complete specification of the
"--archive" or "-a"
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:38:00AM -0500, Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Eventhough i am using "-owner" option while synching to the mate system.
> The owner ship from the System A is not restored in the System B.
The user running the program needs to have permissions to set the owner
in
ut, the patch should be applied to the CVS
version, which is also available in this "nightly" tar file:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/nightly/rsync-HEAD-20040409-1343PDT.tar.gz
Comments welcomed. Anyone testing this, please let me know. Thanks.
..wayne..
* FYI, the aforementioned co
Hi!
The attached patch allows logging to stderr. Unlike the other patch
posted by John H. Robinson, IV, this one does not need /dev/stderr.
It's needed for running rsync in a fully chrooted, supervised [1]
environment.
[1] http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
CU Sascha
--
Registered Linux User #7
As mentioned on the rsync home page, the --files-from=FILE option in rsync
version 2.6.0 is a useful option that allows one to "specify a list of
files to transfer, and can be much more efficient than a recursive descent
using include/exclude statements (if you know in advance what files you want t
