On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 15:31, Greger Cronquist wrote:
> For just creating diffs, xdelta is even better (in that it creates
> smaller diffs very quickly)
xdelta requires that you have local access to the two files you want to
diff... librsync's rdiff allows you to calculate a small signature which
For just creating diffs, xdelta is even better (in that it creates
smaller diffs very quickly)
/Greger
Donovan Baarda wrote:
G'day,
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 13:37, Steve W. Ingram wrote:
Hi there,
I was wondering if there was anyway to use rsync to effectively
create a 'diff' file?
is this
G'day,
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 13:37, Steve W. Ingram wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was wondering if there was anyway to use rsync to effectively
> create a 'diff' file?
is this a FAQ yet?
A) rdiff.
--
Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/
--
To unsubscribe or chang
Hi there,
I was wondering if there was anyway to use rsync to effectively
create a 'diff' file?
I have a situation where I don't have a network connection
to certain files that are multi-gigabyte and binary (mainly),
but they vary little.
In order for me to have an up-to-date copy of the files,
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I have on my server a big file tree. I want to use rsync to download
> only the PDF files, which make up a small portion of that tree. So I try
> it this way:
>
> rsync -aHPvz --include '*.pdf' --exclude '**' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I ran rsync with the --one-file-system option and observed:
building file list ... readlink_stat "/home/pimlott/mnt/" failed:
Input/output error
done
IO error encountered - skipping file deletion
Of course, this directory is a remote mount-point, and the remote host
cannot be reached