On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:34:06PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> jw schultz wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:47:19PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Actually - the problem is disk IO. And the disk IO is what makes the
> >>load levels go up. The load level is something that's read
jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:47:19PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Actually - the problem is disk IO. And the disk IO is what makes the
load levels go up. The load level is something that's readable can can
be used to have rsync slow itself down. Nice doesn't do the trick. Nice
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:47:19PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Actually - the problem is disk IO. And the disk IO is what makes the
> load levels go up. The load level is something that's readable can can
> be used to have rsync slow itself down. Nice doesn't do the trick. Nice
> helps - but eve
Actually - the problem is disk IO. And the disk IO is what makes the
load levels go up. The load level is something that's readable can can
be used to have rsync slow itself down. Nice doesn't do the trick. Nice
helps - but even at nice +19 it still slows the system to a crawl when
backing up f
Marc Perkel wrote:
down under high load levels. Seems to me that it could be something
fairly easy to add to have it check the load levels and back down so as
not to slow down the system.
As jw indicated, it isn't such a great idea to put that into rsync
itself. Instead, use the OS-supplied faci
Hi,
Does rsync treat vpns to a third machine differently? I assumed it
wouldn't rsync the files on a remote machine, C to server A, but it is.
E.g., Linux Rsync Bkup Server A < - > FreeBSD file server B
<---VPN---> file server C. Rsync transfers the VPN'd files with
seemingly with no compl
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:16:32PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> If you aleady are doing this - then thanks. But here's a feature I'd
> like to see.
>
> Rsync often puts a lot of load on the system because of high disk
> access. I'd like to see rsync become "load aware" and to slow itself
> down
If you aleady are doing this - then thanks. But here's a feature I'd
like to see.
Rsync often puts a lot of load on the system because of high disk
access. I'd like to see rsync become "load aware" and to slow itself
down under high load levels. Seems to me that it could be something
fairly ea
I am trying to rsync between two linux boxes, but one of the linux boxes is
using samba to map a share from a windows SAN onto it's file system. Rsync
quit working properly when I changed the source directory from a local ext3
filesystem to the windows share mapped onto the filesystem. This setup m
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:28:20AM -0500, Jason M. Felice wrote:
> All callers of robust_rename() call copy_file() if EXDEV is received.
> This patch moves the copy_file() call into robust_rename().
Seems like a good simplification. I did a refinement pass on your
changes, and also added back a d
This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received
files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system
will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of
the file's name.
(rev 3)
* Don't link empty files.
* Roll over to new
On Tuesday 2004-02-17 09:34, Jason M. Felice wrote:
| All instances of the file will have the last mtime/permissions/ownership.
| This is not such a big deal for me (although it is annoying), but I
| can't afford to keep multiple copies of files just because the metadata
| is different. If anyone
All callers of robust_rename() call copy_file() if EXDEV is received. This
patch moves the copy_file() call into robust_rename().
Patch Summary:
-12 +1backup.c
-15 +2rsync.c
-9 +33 util.c
patchwork diff util.c
--- util.c 2004-02-17 09:58:44.0 -0500
+++ util
On Thursday 12 February 2004 10:55 pm, jw schultz wrote:
> Try the patch and let us know.ÂÂThatÂshouldÂallowÂyouÂto
> function.ÂÂCVSÂ(whichÂdoesÂnotÂhaveÂthatÂpatch)Ârequires
> about 20 bytes less per-file.
Instead of the patch, I simply broke my rsync job into smaller pieces.
Thank you for the h
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:48:32PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote:
> "Jason M. Felice" writes:
>
> > This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received
> > files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system
> > will only store one copy of the unique co
Hi,
I am newbee to this group. I am in need of ACL support. When I browsed
through the list mails I could find the link for a ACL patch. But it is
available only for rsync 2.5.6. I also came across the security advise
posted in the website on versions prior 2.5.7. So it would be better if I
At 05:26 + 2/17/04, Andrew Liles wrote:
check /var/log/messages
All it has is stuff related to my Win2K machine (argh!):
Feb 17 05:39:23 katri dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 10.0.0.4 via le0
Feb 17 05:39:23 katri dhcpd: DHCPACK to 10.0.0.4
check you have the correct file permissions on the daemon sec
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:58:25AM -0500, Ethan Tira-Thompson wrote:
> I sync files to a memory stick fairly frequently. The memory stick
> uses a basic FAT format, which kills case. What's more, on some
> platforms (Windows), the drivers make all filenames uppercase, whereas
> on others (linu
Hi! Im looking for the Jamie Bolden whom have the domain for Yesmine.com.
Can you please conntact me.
Best regards
YESMINE
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
