Re: File rename detection?

2004-01-28 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 05:12:04PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:42:12AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 06:27, jw schultz wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:06:52PM +0300, ??? wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > As I was found rsy

Re: File rename detection?

2004-01-28 Thread jw schultz
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:42:12AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 06:27, jw schultz wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:06:52PM +0300, ??? wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > As I was found rsync do not detect file renaming. If I just copy my > > > backup.0.tgz (ma

Re: File rename detection?

2004-01-28 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 06:27, jw schultz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:06:52PM +0300, ??? wrote: > > Hello! > > > > As I was found rsync do not detect file renaming. If I just copy my > > backup.0.tgz (many Mbytes in size having it's md5) to backup.1.tgz > > (which will be equial

Re: Change in reporting for --dry-run in 2.6.x

2004-01-28 Thread Phil Howard
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:38:11PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote: | I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated | by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have | started with 2.6.0. Is this desired? The reason why I'm asking is | because I us

Re: Server crashed using rsync

2004-01-28 Thread Paul Haas
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Eugen Luca wrote: > I'm trying to make a backup using this command > rsync -auvH /home/ /bak --delete --bwlimit=1000 --status > server load has been increased so much and the server crashed, as well > has gone out of memory > My Server is a Dual Xeon 2.0 GHz with 2GB of

Re: Server crashed using rsync

2004-01-28 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:12:02PM -0500, Eugen Luca wrote: > server load has been increased so much and the server crashed, as well > has gone out of memory The rsync version in CVS has a number of memory-saving optimizations in it. Just the file list reductions (if we ignore -H for now) would

Re: Server crashed using rsync

2004-01-28 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:12:02PM -0500, Eugen Luca wrote: > I'm trying to make a backup using this command > > rsync -auvH /home/ /bak --delete --bwlimit=1000 --status > > server load has been increased so much and the server crashed, as well > has gone out of memory > My Server is a Du

Re: Change in reporting for --dry-run in 2.6.x

2004-01-28 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:38:11PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote: > I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated > by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have > started with 2.6.0. Is this desired? The NEWS file has this (understated statement

Re: File rename detection?

2004-01-28 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:06:52PM +0300, ??? wrote: > Hello! > > As I was found rsync do not detect file renaming. If I just copy my > backup.0.tgz (many Mbytes in size having it's md5) to backup.1.tgz > (which will be equial in size and md5) it will be the same file > in fact... >

Re: Change in reporting for --dry-run in 2.6.x

2004-01-28 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:38:11PM -0500, Alberto Accomazzi wrote: > I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated > by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have > started with 2.6.0. Is this desired? The reason why I'm asking is > because I use

Server crashed using rsync

2004-01-28 Thread Eugen Luca
I'm trying to make a backup using this command rsync -auvH /home/ /bak --delete --bwlimit=1000 --status server load has been increased so much and the server crashed, as well has gone out of memory My Server is a Dual Xeon 2.0 GHz with 2GB of Memory + 1GB Swap. Could be that there are too

File rename detection?

2004-01-28 Thread Дмитрий Агафонов
Hello! As I was found rsync do not detect file renaming. If I just copy my backup.0.tgz (many Mbytes in size having it's md5) to backup.1.tgz (which will be equial in size and md5) it will be the same file in fact... Rsync will delete old file (backup.0.tgz) on the receiving side and download new

Change in reporting for --dry-run in 2.6.x

2004-01-28 Thread Alberto Accomazzi
I just noticed that there is an extra blank line in the output generated by rsync when the --dry-run (-n) flag is used. This seems to have started with 2.6.0. Is this desired? The reason why I'm asking is because I use scripts that parse the output from rsync and little modifications in verb

rlbackup 2.11 released

2004-01-28 Thread John Bowman
I've just released Version 2.11 of rlbackup: http://www.math.ualberta.ca/imaging/rlbackup/ which provides a simple secure rsync-based mechanism for generating and recovering linked backups over the network, with historical pruning. Here are the main recent changes: Tue Jan 28 2004 Version 2.11