Re: --delete-sent-files (AKA --move-files)

2004-01-16 Thread jw schultz
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:30:57PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > Yes, it's time once again to return to the subject of moving files. > With the recent changes to the communications code between the receiver > and the generator, there is now a non-clogging channel that we can use > to signal the sen

--delete-sent-files (AKA --move-files)

2004-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
Yes, it's time once again to return to the subject of moving files. With the recent changes to the communications code between the receiver and the generator, there is now a non-clogging channel that we can use to signal the sender when a file has been successfully transferred, which allows us dele

compatibility of snprintf() return value?

2004-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
It is my belief that there is not a compatibility problem with the return value of snprintf() like there is with sprintf() (i.e. on some systems, like SunOS, sprintf() returns a char* instead of an int, but I don't believe that such systems even have snprintf()). Does anyone know of a system where

Re: Any (known) scaling issues?

2004-01-16 Thread jw schultz
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:55:42PM -0800, Bret Foreman wrote: > I'm considering using rsync in our data center but I'm worried about whether > it will scale to the numbers and sizes we deal with. We would be moving up > to a terabyte in a typical sync, consisting of about a million files. Our > dat

Any (known) scaling issues?

2004-01-16 Thread Bret Foreman
I'm considering using rsync in our data center but I'm worried about whether it will scale to the numbers and sizes we deal with. We would be moving up to a terabyte in a typical sync, consisting of about a million files. Our data mover machines are RedHat Linux Advanced Server 2.1 and all the sour

Re: compilation problem

2004-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:23:56PM -0500, Vlady wrote: > OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 90602f, you have 90703f Rsync doesn't do anything directly with ssl, it runs the ssh program (by default in 2.6.0). You should ensure that you can ssh successfully into the system you want to rsync to

compilation problem

2004-01-16 Thread Vlady
Hello, I have a RedHat 7.3 on which I deinstall the openssl-0.9.6b-35.7 and the openssl-devel-0.9.6b-35.7 packages and compiled&install openssl-0.9.7c-1. After I downloaded, compiled & install rsync-2.6.0 successfully exept that when I try to use I get the error: OpenSSL version mismatch. Buil

Re: -vn doesn't list empty directories, -v does

2004-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:57:21PM -0500, Joe Harrington wrote: > The -vn option lists all files to be copied or deleted, including > symlinks, but it does not appear to list empty directories to be > copied, even tough it copies them. Unfortunately, this is a known bug that we haven't taken the t

Re: Upload only

2004-01-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:32:37AM +, a a wrote: > I know there is a read only option that can be specified in > rsyncd.conf - is there any way to make it upload only? You can exclude everything from the download, like this: exclude = * That would prevent rsync of allowing any file to be dow

RE: rsync backup

2004-01-16 Thread Hergaarden, Marcel
> I've setup SSH for auto login. It seems I can just do > > rsync -e ssh -aupg 10.10.10.24:/home/MYDOMAIN /home fine > > Do I still need /etc/rsyncd.conf on the server? >>Nope. I do the same thing, and I've never needed it. As far as I know you should only have the rsync binary installed. Whe