I am new user of rsync.
I notice rsync will hang under cygwin when transfering files
occasionally, then I see the mail archieve discussing this problem at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08726.html
Does this bugs has been fixed?
Anyone can give me an answer? thanks.
Best Rega
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 02:06:59PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:48:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > Sounds good to me. Should this be sent to rsync-announce?
>
> I had been assuming that just the announcement of the final 2.6.0
> release would go to rsync-announce, bu
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:48:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> Sounds good to me. Should this be sent to rsync-announce?
I had been assuming that just the announcement of the final 2.6.0
release would go to rsync-announce, but apparently there is a precedence
for announcing pre-releases there as w
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:43:05PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> An obvious change that could be made would be to count how much
> data came over the link versus how much came from the local file and
> choose from this ratio which file to save when interrupted
There is some code in rsync that atte
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:32:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had
> been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally
> decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give
> folks a final opportunity
The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had
been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally
decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give
folks a final opportunity to double check the final release:
http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Manuel Mollar wrote:
> If from client I do again the same command, then, in server the 400Mbyte
> file is COPIED to another temporary file, but this take some time.
> I from client I press crtl-C when in server temporary file is not
> already copied, say
Tx for your response, but I am not interested on such reading :-)
My concussion is rsync must be used with more care than necessary
jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Manuel Mollar wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this is well known.
Suposse I am transferring a large (by now) file,
On 28 Dec 2003, at 05:15, jw schultz wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:45:52AM +0100, alain content wrote:
Bad, bad Apple.
Look for the thread on this list with the subject
"workaround for HFS+'s case-insensitivity"
One of the messages discusses options for making hpfs case
sensitive.
Sadly, you ca
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:45:52AM +0100, alain content wrote:
> Right,
> Renaming does not touch the file - it only changes the directory
> modification date.
>
> And you are absolutely right. Panther preserves case but is insensitive to
> case in file names :
> ls
> >...
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 ac ac
Right,
Renaming does not touch the file - it only changes the directory
modification date.
And you are absolutely right. Panther preserves case but is insensitive to
case in file names :
ls
>...
>-rw-r--r-- 1 ac ac 0 27 Dec 11:59 a file named ABC
filetest -e "a file named ABC"
> 1
filetest
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Manuel Mollar wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry if this is well known.
> Suposse I am transferring a large (by now) file, say 1Gbyte with --partial:
> rsync -e ssh -a --partial 1gbfile server:
> If process is interrumpted, temporary file is renamed to good filename
>
Hi,
Sorry if this is well known.
Suposse I am transferring a large (by now) file, say 1Gbyte with --partial:
rsync -e ssh -a --partial 1gbfile server:
If process is interrumpted, temporary file is renamed to good filename
with size samall than original, say 400Mbyte, ok.
If from client I do again
13 matches
Mail list logo
