Re: how rsync works

2003-11-27 Thread Jos Backus
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 03:51:46PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > OK. I've put it back up for now. This document is a > project, not an entity and i have no intention of hosting it > indefinitely. If it is a good resource it belongs on the > rsync web site but i'd like to see it under cvs so the rsy

Re: IPv6 literal addresses on command line

2003-11-27 Thread cam
--- Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu 27 Nov 2003, cam wrote: > > > > I wonder if debian has included more of the USAGI patches that aren't > applied > > to the 'vanilla' kernel from kernel.org? Various comments in the rsync TODO > > The kernel isn't the issue. When compiling a C

Re: IPv6 literal addresses on command line

2003-11-27 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 27 Nov 2003, cam wrote: > > I wonder if debian has included more of the USAGI patches that aren't applied > to the 'vanilla' kernel from kernel.org? Various comments in the rsync TODO The kernel isn't the issue. When compiling a C program, nothing about the kernel is used. In fact, I use a

Re: IPv6 literal addresses on command line

2003-11-27 Thread cam
--- Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu 27 Nov 2003, cam wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] host -t doodah.ipv6.ournet.co.uk > > doodah.ipv6.ournet.co.uk has address 3ffe:501:420:120::2 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rsync -Cav -6 doodah:home/cam/dev/pcapture . > > doodah: Unknown hos

Re: IPv6 literal addresses on command line

2003-11-27 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 27 Nov 2003, cam wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] host -t doodah.ipv6.ournet.co.uk > doodah.ipv6.ournet.co.uk has address 3ffe:501:420:120::2 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rsync -Cav -6 doodah:home/cam/dev/pcapture . > doodah: Unknown host Of course, here you're doing two different things: wit

How hard links are processed (was Test case for hard link failure)

2003-11-27 Thread John Van Essen
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Pete Wenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ ... ] > The above is BAD (nonoptimal) behavior; the entire file is transferred, > even though it could simply have been linked.  It seems that "a" is > transferred before it is determined that a suitable equivalent (linked) > file "b" al

Re: IPv6 literal addresses on command line

2003-11-27 Thread cam
--- cam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Just to get some er, 'closure' on this, if you will (spot the thinly > disguised, desperate repost)... > > To summarise: no-one is currently using rsync over IPv6 on linux. Not so. I got a response from someone happily using rsync on debian. S