On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:52:22PM -0600, John Van Essen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ... This fix is also in CVS (along with several others).
>
> As another poster pointed out recently, it's been a long time since
> 2.5.6 was released (Jan 28 2003
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... This fix is also in CVS (along with several others).
As another poster pointed out recently, it's been a long time since
2.5.6 was released (Jan 28 2003).
Many recent replies to questions posted to this list are variants
of "It
Hello,
I have several individual files in a directory that I want to keep
syncronized. Here's an example:
Server #1 (host):
/tmp/file1
/tmp/file2
Now of course I can run "rsync -a /tmp/file1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp"...
But, when I delete /tmp/file1 from the host and try to run this it
complain
So all I want is rsyncing files while preserving their _absolute_ paths
on the target machine which doesn't seem possible.
Check out the --relative (-R) option in the man page. That would let
you do something like this:
rsync -avR `cat /path/file-list` dest:/
Or, the CVS version of rsync which h
Have you checked the maxdsiz kernel parameter? The default is 0x400
which is only 64MBs.
|-+-->
| | "King, Daniel" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| | Sen
Corey McGuire wrote:
Would something like "find -type d -exec rsync {}/* server::mod/{}/. \;" work
for you?
At least, something elong those lines...
Correct me whilst Im probably wrong... but it touches one of those
questions I lowly sysadmin ponder about: would rsyncing on a per file
bas
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:28:39PM -0500, Ian! D. Allen wrote:
> I see from the CVS log that some of the following awkwardness may be
> fixed (or at least different) in the next public release.
Yes, there was quite a bit of bug-fixing in this area for the next
release. The 2 problems you cited we
Rsync version: rsync-2.5.6-3mdk (Mandrake 9.2)
I see from the CVS log that some of the following awkwardness may be
fixed (or at least different) in the next public release. I'm looking
forward to that. In the interim, here are some problems:
-
Problem 1 - unexpected consequence of repl
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:58:07AM +0100, Thomas Otto wrote:
> So all I want is rsyncing files while preserving their _absolute_ paths
> on the target machine which doesn't seem possible.
Check out the --relative (-R) option in the man page. That would let
you do something like this:
rsync -avR
