On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:49:45AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
>
> Aside from numerous other weaknesses that have crept into
> the manpage i do note that there doesn't seem to be any
> point where it is mentioned that rsync replaces destination
> files rather than updating them in-place. I'm not sur
Hi there,
I already asked the list about the problems with sockets on FreeBSD (see
here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08121.html).
I adopted Andrew Flury's patch to the recent CVS version of rsync:
Index: rsync.h
==
I just glanced at recent rsync messages, and saw the patch from derMouse
together with the rebuffal.
Folks, there is a problem. Patches such as this are *critical* for
portability, especially on 64 bits systems and exotic architectures.
What derMouse did was give you important portability fixes.