On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:56:16PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:38:48PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > for (i=0; i < (int) s->count;i++) {
>
> Yeah, that's pretty bad. Attached is a patch that should fix this and a
> number of other related problems where the code
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:38:48PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> for (i=0; i < (int) s->count;i++) {
Yeah, that's pretty bad. Attached is a patch that should fix this and a
number of other related problems where the code assumed that size_t
would fit into an int. There looks to be a bunch
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:38:48PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Maybe security related mails should be sent elsewhere? I didn't notice
> any so here it goes:
>
> sender.c:receive_sums()
>
> s->count = read_int(f);
> ..
> s->sums = (struct sum_buf *)malloc(sizeof(s->sums[0])*s->count
Maybe security related mails should be sent elsewhere? I didn't notice
any so here it goes:
sender.c:receive_sums()
s->count = read_int(f);
..
s->sums = (struct sum_buf *)malloc(sizeof(s->sums[0])*s->count);
if (!s->sums) out_of_memory("receive_sums");
for (i=0; i
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:38:20AM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Paul Thompson wrote:
>
> | 2.4.5 success success 2.4.6 failure failure
>
> Funny this is: 2.4.6 is exactly the release where many cygwin-related
> patches landed in
