On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 04:17:46PM +1200, Steve Wray wrote:
> Assuming that you arn't talking about a local copy,
> but using rsync over a network, would it be silly to
> suggest using --bwlimit?
No need to make that assumption. --bwlimit can also be used
for local syncing. Local rsync does a pu
Assuming that you arn't talking about a local copy,
but using rsync over a network, would it be silly to
suggest using --bwlimit?
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to use rsync on a production box that has a great deal of
> memory-cached filesystem in use at all time
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:04:19PM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 14:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'd like to use rsync on a production box that has a great deal of
> > memory-cached filesystem in use at all times. Is there any way, or any
> > other tool, that will do a "sl
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 14:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to use rsync on a production box that has a great deal of
> memory-cached filesystem in use at all times. Is there any way, or any
> other tool, that will do a "slow" copy? purposefully not busting the
> cache by copying things as fas
I'd like to use rsync on a production box that has a great deal of
memory-cached filesystem in use at all times. Is there any way, or any
other tool, that will do a "slow" copy? purposefully not busting the
cache by copying things as fast as possible?
"nice" does not work, of course, as that is a
I didn't search the web for this - I just looked for
*.h files in the rsync source, and found error.h. I'm
guessing the contents of error.h is what you're after.
Check the rsync source out of CVS and view error.h.
HTH.
--
Hardy Merrill
Red Hat, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Ron DuFresne wrote:
platform . But, I'd certainly not feel safe, nor secure, running
any service cgywin or not in a production or exposed setting on any
windows platform.
You want to say you don't feel safe running Windows :)
In my case I
Hi !
I've spent countless hours search the internet to find a list of exit codes
for rsync. Can someone point me to a list of error codes and their
meanings?
this would be much appreciated !!
thanks !!
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before p
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Ron DuFresne wrote:
> platform at the endpoint>. But, I'd certainly not feel safe, nor secure, running
> any service cgywin or not in a production or exposed setting on any
> windows platform.
You want to say you don't feel safe running Windows :)
In my case I plan to us
Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Jim Salter wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what that site's reason for existence is. It says it
requires cygwin, and cygwin already comes pre-packaged with rsync, so ...?
I wasn't aware that cygwin have rsync, that makes things much easier :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Piotr Krukowiecki wrote:
| I wasn't aware that cygwin have rsync, that makes things much easier
| :)
|
| I plan of using only server mode so that should not bother me.
Refer to /usr/doc/Cygwin/rsync-2.5.6.README to install it as a windows
service:
Mini
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Jim Salter wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure what that site's reason for existence is. It says it
> requires cygwin, and cygwin already comes pre-packaged with rsync, so ...?
I wasn't aware that cygwin have rsync, that makes things much easier :)
> all (knock on wood) although
A couple of ideas about things that would be nice to see in rsync:
1. a "0.5v" option - something that would just show a progress either by file or by
megabyte, ie "processing file 1,048 of 9,032" or "processing: 832 of 3,459 MB". The
standard "verbose" is good for troubleshooting, but it's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Salter wrote:
| I'm not entirely sure what that site's reason for existence is. It
| says it requires cygwin, and cygwin already comes pre-packaged with
| rsync, so ...?
Moreover that website doesn't comply to the GPL license, as it has no
sources
I'm not entirely sure what that site's reason for existence is. It says it
requires cygwin, and cygwin already comes pre-packaged with rsync, so ...?
As to whether the version of rsync that is packaged with Cygwin is "okay":
some people on this list have had problems with rsync under cygwin hangi
[I'm not subscribed to this list, please CC me on replies]
Hi,
well, the topic says it all ;)
I want to know if it's safe to use them (yes, i know it's not safe,
but if someone says 'they fucked my computer' i will know i can't use
them. If noone says anything i will find someone to test them ;
16 matches
Mail list logo
