"John E. Malmberg" writes:
> What is the status of rsync on Windows 2000?
>
> I was looking to install it on my test system, and the download
> directory has a readme file that says I need the cygnus gnu-win32 library.
>
> The link refers me to the index page for cygnus, with no way to get to a
What is the status of rsync on Windows 2000?
I was looking to install it on my test system, and the download
directory has a readme file that says I need the cygnus gnu-win32 library.
The link refers me to the index page for cygnus, with no way to get to a
download area. A google search shows
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:00:47AM +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Alan Burlison wrote:
>
> >>That is what really happens. The client specified timeout
> >>is passed over the wire for use by the server but if the
> >>server has a value specified in rsyncd.conf that value will
> >>override the clien
jw schultz wrote:
While I don't know about the ins-and-outs of globbing libraries (and,
therefore, can't judge ease, etc)...
The whole "it's rare [and an obscure (imo) work around exists] so let's not
worry about it" is a reason to reject a feature, NOT a bug fix.
As Alan already has done much
Alan Burlison wrote:
That is what really happens. The client specified timeout
is passed over the wire for use by the server but if the
server has a value specified in rsyncd.conf that value will
override the client.
OK, right - thanks for the clarification. Still leaves me with the
puzzle of w
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:18:40PM -0400, Bert wrote:
> >I must say I'm slightly dismayed
> >by the less-than-enthusiastic response I have received - I've
> >identified a problem, root-cause it and even offered to submit
> >a fix - what exactly is the problem?
>
> While I don't know about the ins-
I must say I'm slightly dismayed
by the less-than-enthusiastic response I have received - I've
identified a problem, root-cause it and even offered to submit
a fix - what exactly is the problem?
While I don't know about the ins-and-outs of globbing libraries (and,
therefore, can't judge ease, etc)
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:57:15AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:51:53AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > If for some reason they specify
> > --suffix=~ --backup-dir=../foo
> > it should create the backup files with the requested suffix.
>
> Yes, I totally agree. Fortun
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:51:53AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> If for some reason they specify
> --suffix=~ --backup-dir=../foo
> it should create the backup files with the requested suffix.
Yes, I totally agree. Fortunately, that's what the code does.
> We want to send the suffix if they s
Hi!
I have a weird problem I can't quite grasp. I rsync machines directories to
a central machine and backup from there to tape. So far so fine. But I have
weird hangings with rsync doing nothing whatsoever on some files. If this
situation arises, rsync won't go on with processing, won't actually
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:21:53AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> [I apparently lost some of my email that was sent to my samba.org
> address due to some bogus spam filtering involving my use of spamcop.org
> (which I just turned off). I looked up your reply in a mailing list
> archive on the web..
[I apparently lost some of my email that was sent to my samba.org
address due to some bogus spam filtering involving my use of spamcop.org
(which I just turned off). I looked up your reply in a mailing list
archive on the web...]
> My only concern is that i don't like depending on
> strcmp(backup
12 matches
Mail list logo
