Re: does rsync lock exclusively files to copy?

2003-07-23 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:12:21PM -0400, Haralabos Athanassiou wrote: [reformatted because sender mailer is broken] > I'm running rsync 2.5.6 on windows (via cygwin) and I've > had other processes try to open the same files as rsync, > but could not get through sometimes. Does rsync place a > shar

does rsync lock exclusively files to copy?

2003-07-23 Thread Haralabos Athanassiou
I'm running rsync 2.5.6 on windows (via cygwin) and I've had other processes try to open the same files as rsync, but could not get through sometimes. Does rsync place a shared lock or an exclusive lock on the files it will copy from? I checked into the sources but did not find any use of flock(

Re: bug report: SUMMARY different files are not rsynced, identicalfiles rsynced

2003-07-23 Thread Peter Chun
jw schultz wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:52:44AM +1000, Peter Chun wrote: Hi, I have only just subscribe to the list. ( only to send this bug report ) Running rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 ( on Solaris 8 sparc ) on both hosts. I have 1 file I wish to sync to a remote machin

Re: bug report: different files are not rsynced,identical files rsynced

2003-07-23 Thread jw schultz
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:52:44AM +1000, Peter Chun wrote: > Hi, > I have only just subscribe to the list. ( only to send this bug report ) > > Running rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 ( on Solaris 8 sparc ) > on both hosts. > > I have 1 file I wish to sync to a remote machine > the m

bug report: different files are not rsynced, identical files rsynced

2003-07-23 Thread Peter Chun
Hi, I have only just subscribe to the list. ( only to send this bug report ) Running rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 ( on Solaris 8 sparc ) on both hosts. I have 1 file I wish to sync to a remote machine the md5 checksum is host1: MD5 (030722.mj) = 020397fde83c2e20464b6642c018ce6e host

Re: Linux Rsync so files

2003-07-23 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:15:07PM -0700, Ben Escoto wrote: > > "Ken" == ryvral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote the following on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:03:14 -0400 > > Ken> Hey all.. I'm using the command: > > Ken> rsync -lHtSuWvzrvopglD -e ssh -C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/gameservers / > >

Re: Linux Rsync so files

2003-07-23 Thread Ben Escoto
> "Ken" == ryvral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote the following on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:03:14 -0400 Ken> Hey all.. I'm using the command: Ken> rsync -lHtSuWvzrvopglD -e ssh -C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/gameservers / Ken> But its not moving *.so files.. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Try ad

Re: Linux Rsync so files

2003-07-23 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:03:14PM -0400, Ryvral wrote: > rsync -lHtSuWvzrvopglD -e ssh -C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/gameservers / > > But its not moving *.so files.. Any idea what I am doing wrong? They're excluded by -C (--cvs-exclude). You could add an explicit --include='*.so', if you want to overr

Linux Rsync so files

2003-07-23 Thread Ryvral
Hey all.. I'm using the command: rsync -lHtSuWvzrvopglD -e ssh -C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/gameservers / But its not moving *.so files.. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Thanks Ken -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.o

Re: Does block level replication require local disk access (Blocklev el) or can it work with a network share too

2003-07-23 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Wed, 2003-07-23 13:20:12 -0700, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:10:22PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 14:18:41 +0100, Antony Parkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It is ve

Re: Does block level replication require local disk access (Blocklev el) or can it work with a network share too

2003-07-23 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:10:22PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-23 14:18:41 +0100, Antony Parkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * > > This e-mail and any attachment is confident

Re: Does block level replication require local disk access (Blocklev el) or can it work with a network share too

2003-07-23 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Wed, 2003-07-23 14:18:41 +0100, Antony Parkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * > This e-mail and any attachment is confidential. It may only be read, copied and used > by the intended recipient(s).

Re: Does block level replication require local disk access (Blocklev el) or can it work with a network share too

2003-07-23 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:18:41PM +0100, Antony Parkin wrote: > Could i run rsync on a linux server which is connected to a network share > (NAS) and replicate the diffs of the files residing on the network share? or Rsync will run just fine on network filesystems. That said, due to the disk acc

(no subject)

2003-07-23 Thread Oliver Dewdney
Here is a diff which should allow applying batch updates remotely ( as apposed to copying the batch files to the remote server and running rsync there ). Eg rsync --write-batch=test src dst1::dst rsync --read-batch=test dst2::dst Oli Dewdney diff -E -B -c -r rsync-2.5.6/flist.c rsync-2.5.6-r

Re: Does block level replication require local disk access (Blocklev el) or can it work with a network share too

2003-07-23 Thread Steve Bonds
Rsync works entirely at the file level, and stores the "diffs" in a temporary file until the transfer is complete. No block/device level access is needed. -- Steve On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Antony Parkin AntonyP-at-bluearc.com |Rsync List| wrote: > Could i run rsync on a linux server which is conn

Does block level replication require local disk access (Block level) or can it work with a network share too

2003-07-23 Thread Antony Parkin
Could i run rsync on a linux server which is connected to a network share (NAS) and replicate the diffs of the files residing on the network share? or does this functionality require block level access i.e Local disk or SAN? Many thanks, Antony. *