Re: unexplained error occurs with options "o" or "g"

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:48:26PM -0600, Hursch, Robert wrote: > I am running rsync ver 2.5.5 on HP-UX 11.0. Whenever I run an rsync > specifying the "o" or "g" option to maintain owner or group info, I get > an error similar to the one below. The actual error code changes every > time, but it's

Re: Rsync lock-up

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:16:11PM -0400, Michael Kohne wrote: > I'm getting some odd behaviour from rsync - a lockup when doing local > copies. I tried to search the list archives, but I only came up with a > couple of hits from 2001 indicating folks thought this (or a similar > issue) was fixed.

Re: Rsync Performance In Windows

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:08:43PM -0500, Chris McKeever wrote: > Greger.. > I replaced the rsync.exe with the one from your link, it relieved the > windows CPU some (from 100% to 98% with flucuation to 100%). > > I also took the advice of using the -u switch. From the man: > > -u, --update

unexplained error occurs with options "o" or "g"

I am running rsync ver 2.5.5 on HP-UX 11.0. Whenever I run an rsync specifying the "o" or "g" option to maintain owner or group info, I get an error similar to the one below. The actual error code changes every time, but it's always the same main.c line number. The error message does not occur i

Make error for Rsync 2.5.6 on HP-UX 11.0

I'm an new to rsync and am having the following problem: On a HP-UX 11.0 server, I am trying to install rsync 2.5.6. After running configure, I run the standard HP make, but with the GCC compiler specified. I get the following error. lib/snprintf.c:760: conflicting types for `snprintf' /usr/loca

Oops more testing was required....

Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Roger. -- ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* * The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience * * ex

bwlimit patch.

Hi, I Emailed this afternoon that bwlimit leads to a much too low bwlimit if small amounts of data are sent in each write. I wrote a small patch now. Congrats on the code: It's nice and clean: I wrote a working patch in 5 minutes after examining a total of 25 lines of code. (My backup used t

Rsync lock-up

I'm getting some odd behaviour from rsync - a lockup when doing local copies. I tried to search the list archives, but I only came up with a couple of hits from 2001 indicating folks thought this (or a similar issue) was fixed. Situation: (OS is RedHat 7.2, Rsync rpm 2.4.6-5 and 2.5.5-1 exhibit th

RE: Rsync Performance In Windows

Greger.. I replaced the rsync.exe with the one from your link, it relieved the windows CPU some (from 100% to 98% with flucuation to 100%). I also took the advice of using the -u switch. From the man: -u, --updateupdate only (don't overwrite newer files) I just want to make sur

Re: rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (Broken pipe)

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:10:38AM -0500, Nathaniel Case wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 at 16:24:25 -0700, jw schultz wrote: > > > > > After looking at io.c, it seems like the problem (rather, the symptom) > > > for > > > this error message is a failed write() call (which explains the Broken > > > Pi

Re: rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (Broken pipe)

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 at 16:24:25 -0700, jw schultz wrote: > > > After looking at io.c, it seems like the problem (rather, the symptom) > > for > > this error message is a failed write() call (which explains the Broken > > Pipe message to stderr). I thought maybe --blocking-io would avoid this > > i

Re: efficiency issue with rsync.....

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:46:41AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:49:09PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > > > Hi rsync team, > > > > I thought that rsync would try to overlap computing and IO on both > > machines. > > > > I'm rsyncing a large tree (18G) and am keeping an

Re: efficiency issue with rsync.....

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:49:09PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > Hi rsync team, > > I thought that rsync would try to overlap computing and IO on both > machines. > > I'm rsyncing a large tree (18G) and am keeping an eye on that. > Suddenly my side completely stopped. No IO visible, no CPU >

efficiency issue with rsync.....

Hi rsync team, I thought that rsync would try to overlap computing and IO on both machines. I'm rsyncing a large tree (18G) and am keeping an eye on that. Suddenly my side completely stopped. No IO visible, no CPU time spent. The otherside was doing 100% CPU. Then the other side started to do