Attached patch illustrates* the dead code removal.
Code providing backwards compatability with protocol versions
prior to 15 is excised.
* for the sake of readability patch is made with diff -ub so
indentation changes are not observed. Actual changes will
fix indentation on no-longer condit
-Original Message-
From: Susan Ator
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:32 PM
To: 'jw schultz'
Subject: RE: Logging on the rsync server from a client connect
Thanks. It turns out I needed to add rsync to my ipchains. Once I did that I
was able to connect correctly and log the informatio
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:46:27AM -0500, Chris Darroch wrote:
>OK, thanks -- here's the patch I'm using now for my own
> installation.
>
>If there's no desire to put it (or a better version of it)
> into CVS, then I'd suggest changing the man page so that the
> behaviour of rsync with --l
About the previous request for the public key...I found a reference that
the public key was on a public key server and was able to pull it down
from pgp.mit.edu. Thanks anyway.
--
=
David May
Senior UNIX System Administrator
Albuquerque TVI
505-224-3015
--
To uns
I am sorry if this is a bother...
I am looking for the PGP/GPG public key that rsync was signed with. I
can't find it at samba.org or the rsync web site. Sorry if I am missing
something obvious, but would you please point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance for any help.
--
=
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:00:38AM +, Terry Raggett wrote:
> I'm sorry if you mis-understood me on this issue. I'm not trying to
> denigrate Rsync, as we are convinced that it is a highly capable tool
> that we can adapt for our needs. It is just that in certain situations
> the checksum pro
Comitted to cvs.
--
J.W. SchultzPegasystems Technologies
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.or
I'm sorry if you mis-understood me on this issue. I'm not trying to
denigrate Rsync, as we are convinced that it is a highly capable tool
that we can adapt for our needs. It is just that in certain situations
the checksum processing absorbs a lot of CPU time. I have a user that
has been using t
