Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 16:33, jw schultz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:56:42AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 03:36, jw schultz wrote: [..] > > > hadn't a decent fast integer sqrt function at hand. I don't > > > really care to start bringing in the math lib just for th

Rsync snapshots problem.

2003-03-23 Thread Warren Mannington
From: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2002-December/009101.html >Well, I followed this link: http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/ > >and implemented it (with a bit of tweaking) on my home network. It is >used to make snapshots of two Windows PC's over samba. On one of the >ma

Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread jw schultz
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:56:42AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 03:36, jw schultz wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:54:26AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:46:34AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > [...] > > CHUNK_SIZE is used in mapping the file i

Re: Modified --files-from patch

2003-03-23 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 11:21:28AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > - I need to ensure that the user's input data doesn't contain a line >of just "" or the transfer will get messed up (and this may >well allow an attack on a server daemon). While I was working on this, I decided the easi

Rsyncing Linux to OS X

2003-03-23 Thread a . h . s . boy
I'm trying to use rsync to backup some database files on a Linux box to an OS X machine, so I can write them to a tape drive connected to the OS X machine. I'm aware that there are some "issues" about rsync and certain file forks found on HFS+ filesystems, but I'm not sure that should be stoppi

Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 03:36, jw schultz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:54:26AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:46:34AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: [...] > CHUNK_SIZE is used in mapping the file into memory. I'm > not absolutely sure (haven't spelunked that part of the

Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread jw schultz
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:02:28AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:54:26AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:46:34AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 05:45:47PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 07:40

Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread jw schultz
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:54:26AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:46:34AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 05:45:47PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 07:40, jw schultz wrote: > > > > The two attached patches implement per-file

Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:54:26AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:46:34AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 05:45:47PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 07:40, jw schultz wrote: [...] > The block_size heuristic is pretty arbitary,

Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 03:46:34AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 05:45:47PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 07:40, jw schultz wrote: > > [...] > > > The two attached patches implement per-file dynamic checksum > > > lengths. [...] > > I think it makes sen

Re: [RFC] dynamic checksum size

2003-03-23 Thread jw schultz
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 05:45:47PM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: > On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 07:40, jw schultz wrote: > [...] > > The two attached patches implement per-file dynamic checksum > > lengths. > > Nice one. > > > Here is a quick table showing the file sizes at which > > transition occurs,

Re: Need Help.

2003-03-23 Thread Max Bowsher
derix suartyo wrote: > Dear Expert, > > I'm very newbie with rsync and i just installed RSYNC > in both of my servers. Let say the server is ServerA > (10.1.1.1) and ServerB (10.1.1.2). Rsync daemon runs > in server A. The rsycnd.conf is like this (i save this > file in /etc/rsyncd.conf): > > uid