Please test rsync-2.5.6pre2

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz There's also a corresponding

Re: Q : Rsync verbose message

2003-01-20 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:46:56AM +0900, Yuji Sato wrote: > wrote 30 bytes read 200 bytes 60.00 bytes/sec > total size is 4000 speedup is 125.30 > > "bytes/sec" > Is this figure only as a result of a file transfer? > Or is it the total result of since the rsync command is

Q : Rsync verbose message

2003-01-20 Thread Yuji Sato
Hi, I am using rsync for file server mirroring by Linux(Redhat7.2). Please tell me, How to read about rsync last verbose message. wrote 30 bytes read 200 bytes 60.00 bytes/sec total size is 4000 speedup is 125.30 "bytes/sec" Is this figure only

Re: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

2003-01-20 Thread jw schultz
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 07:00:55PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > I submitted a change to ignore errors from chmod when -p is not set. > GNU cp does the same thing. > > - Dave Dykstra Fair enough. It is an isane condition except for filesystem semantics mismatch. > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:13:4

Re: am I missing something, or are permissions always preserved?

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
I submitted a change to ignore errors from chmod when -p is not set. GNU cp does the same thing. - Dave Dykstra On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:13:48PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 02:38:29PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:00:58AM -0800, Ben wrote: > >

Re: possible typo/bug in receiver.c

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 12:25:05AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:39:31PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote: > > If mkstemp() fails (for various reasons, including the directory not > > existing) then fd == -1. So the first if () executes, which flushes > > the data and does a c

Re: IPv6 hosts allow|deny

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
Thanks for the quick tutorial. I submitted your patch, changing eth0 to link1 as Hideaki suggested. - Dave On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:35:09PM +0100, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:31:26AM +0100, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > > > On Mo

Re: Windows and default --modify-window=0

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
I submitted a patch similar to what Max suggested. Nobody came up with a definitive answer on whether the modify-window default should be 1 or 2 so I left it at 2. - Dave On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 06:27:31PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > Dave Dykstra wrote: > > Ok, I agree --modify-window should def

once again: strange characters

2003-01-20 Thread bart . coninckx
Hi all, I'm currently testing the Novell Netware version of Rsync 2.5.5. I use a RH 80 linux client, the Novell server runs the daemon. The Novell server has 850 (=latin1 ?) as codepage and users sometimes create filenames with "odd" (international) characters in them. These appear to be converte

Re: IPv6 hosts allow|deny

2003-01-20 Thread Bert Vermeulen
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Dave Dykstra wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:31:26AM +0100, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > > > > I don't understand enough how that syntax works in order to be able > > > to write an explanation for people. Could you please try to w

Re: IPv6 hosts allow|deny

2003-01-20 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:54:47 -0600), Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > I have never been introduced to IPv6 addresses before and there are some > things about your documentation that baffle me. Perhaps I just need to > be educated a little, or perhaps it wo

Re: IPv6 hosts allow|deny

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:31:26AM +0100, Bert Vermeulen wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > > I don't understand enough how that syntax works in order to be able > > to write an explanation for people. Could you please try to write > > something up based on the current version

Re: [patch] Recent IPv6 changes in rsync/access.c

2003-01-20 Thread Dave Dykstra
Thanks, I will apply your patch, especially since (for the record) Hideaki posted in a reply: > > The suggested fix Daniel Hartmeier (an OpenBSD developer) had when > > I asked (for I'm not really a coder and I wanted to double check > > that this was a valid problem) was making the mask[w] assign