On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:13:51PM -0800, Stephen Friedl wrote:
> This is a patch to rsync 2.5.5, and it serves two purposes. The small
> patches to batch.c, flist.c and log.c simply add "void" to some function
> definitions so that all declarations in proto.h have full parameter lists.
>
>
Fyi: I just committed the changes to the test scripts; they now all use
``$RSYNC'' to refer to the newly built executable.
Please let me know if this causes any problems.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA
_/ _/ _/
Hello list,
This is a patch to rsync 2.5.5, and it serves two purposes. The small
patches to batch.c, flist.c and log.c simply add "void" to some function
definitions so that all declarations in proto.h have full parameter lists.
unsigned char read_batch_flags()OLD
unsigne
Version 2.5.5 on the receiving side seems to fix the problem.
Thanks!
Ed
Craig Barratt wrote:
Has anybody seen this? We want to seperate the statistics out from the
file list, and were using tail to grab the end of the file. the command
we run is:
rsync -r -a -z --partia
Hello,
I am experience a problem with rsync spawned process will not die on their
own. The problem first showed its face when I ran rsync through
/etc/inetd.conf. I changed to running rsyncd as daemon and I still have
the problem.
Description:
1) I have rsync server setup with following parame
I am trying to sync some large (greater than 2
gigabytes) files, pushing them from a Win2k client to
a Win2k machine running the rsync daemon. Both
machines have the CYGWIN environmental variable set to
ntsec.
Below is the full session. There is only one file in
the MyDatabase directory on the
Hello All,
I have searched for this error and found similiar errors, but
everything seems to indicate that this should be fixed in the 2.5.5
version.
rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26
I am running rsync with -axz, trying to sync up a large gz file :
Source machine:
-rw-r--r--1 roo
I thought I was -- upgraded to the latest this morning and am testing now.
I was running 2.4.3.
I'll let you know if this clears the problem.
Thanks!
Ed
Craig Barratt wrote:
Has anybody seen this? We want to seperate the statistics out from the
file list, and were using tail to g
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Steve Mallett) 23.12.02 08:52
Once upon a time Steve Mallett shaped the electrons to say...
>> Seems so.
>> The "private" key file MUST ONLY be readable to the user, no one
>> else. "chmod 600 "
>>
>> Rainer
>Changing the perms to 600 did it. Tally Ho.
But of cause many of o
Seems so.
The "private" key file MUST ONLY be readable to the user, no one else.
"chmod 600 "
Rainer
Changing the perms to 600 did it. Tally Ho.
Steve Mallett
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/f
10 matches
Mail list logo