On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:37:43AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:08:19PM +1300, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > Greetings list admins
> >
> > I'd just like to add that as almost all the SPAM I receive is HTML, a very
> > effective way to get rid of a very large fraction of
DEAR SIR,
WE, ANYANG QINGLONG TOWEL CO.,LTD, IS A LARGE FACTORY WHICH SPECIALIZING IN PRODUCING
HIGH QUALITY AND COMPETITIVE PRICE TOWEL FOR OUR CLIENTS.
AS A PROFESSIONAL MANUFACTURER AND EXPORTER, WE REGARD THE BEST QUALITY AND SERVICE AS
THE MOST IMPORTANT POLICY IN THE BUSINESS. STRICT MANA
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:18:06AM -0500, marco wrote:
> I even tried this but it include the whole /var/ folder !
> I just want /var/lib/zope.
The solution is that after you include something that is too general,
you need to exclude what you don't want. Like this:
/etc
/var
- /*
/var/lib
- /va
This is why regular expression matching is 1000 times more powerful.
I submitted a patch a few months ago.
marco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:22:48 -0800
> jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?crivait :
>
> I found this on the FAQ-O-Matic from the rsync webite
>
> http://rsync.s
Le Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:22:48 -0800
jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
I found this on the FAQ-O-Matic from the rsync webite
http://rsync.samba.org/fom-serve/cache/164.html
I'm so agree...
Is it possible to make it true ?
thanks
--
marco
--
Clé PGP publique : https://iftbqp.mine.nu/marc
Le Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:22:48 -0800
jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
> You forgot to include /var/ and /var/lib/ so it never even
> sees /var/lib/zope/
I even tried this but it include the whole /var/ folder !
I just want /var/lib/zope.
--
marco
--
Clé PGP publique : https://iftbqp.mine.
First let me say that Martin (and any others list managers)
is doing pretty well. Although there was a breif rise in
the volumen of spam leaking through during the transition
it has settled down quite nicely. This is an arms war and
I don't expect perfection. Cudos!
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:0
While on the subject of spam, wouldn't it be an idea to maybe strip
senders' email
addresses from the mail archives, or just making a version with email
addresses
available to subscribers?
Sorry if this has been brought up before, but it occurred to me that
keeping them
publicly visible might n
Greetings list admins
I'd just like to add that as almost all the SPAM I receive is HTML, a very
effective way to get rid of a very large fraction of spam would be to refuse
all HTML posts. I've not seen any genuine posts to this list which have been
web pages.
--
Sincerely etc.,
Christopher
