On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:30:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And why it tries to get 100% CPU even though there's nothing to do ?
What do you mean "nothing to do"? Rsync is creating the new version of
a changed file which is done both by transferring data over the network
and by copying m
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:05:20PM -0600, Jon Gabrielson wrote:
> I am using the following command and the excluded
> directory /usr/share/doc/ still appears with all it's contents in the
> backup directory when it's contents should be deleted. Is this a bug
> or am I doing something wrong?
>
>
I am using the following command and the excluded
directory /usr/share/doc/ still appears with all it's contents in the
backup directory when it's contents should be deleted. Is this a bug
or am I doing something wrong?
rsync --delete --delete-excluded -a -R --exclude="/proc/*" --exclude="/dev/*
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Gurnish Anand wrote:
> Can somebody give me a quick education on sync'ing users, passwords and
> groups between 2 linux servers. Im using Redhat 7.1 as PDC and BDC using
> Samba. I want to sync mainly /etc/passwd, /etc/smbpasswd, /etc/group to
> get a consistancy going in t
Gurnish Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can somebody give me a quick education on sync'ing users, passwords
> and groups between 2 linux servers. Im using Redhat 7.1 as PDC and
> BDC using Samba. I want to sync mainly /etc/passwd, /etc/smbpasswd,
> /etc/group to get a consistancy going in the d
Hello,
I am trying to use rsync (version 2.5.5) in a server client
model to distribute software files. When I kick off the
rsync client on an AIX 4.3.3 pwr3 platform, I get the
following error message. We are in a real bind to get this
protocol going; any help/insight/suggestions would be
"greatl
Can somebody give me a quick education on sync'ing users, passwords and
groups between 2 linux servers. Im using Redhat 7.1 as PDC and BDC using
Samba. I want to sync mainly /etc/passwd, /etc/smbpasswd, /etc/group to
get a consistancy going in the domain...
please guide me sync'ing passwords bet
(I'm not subscribed; Mail-Followup-To set.)
Contrary to the claim in the output of ./configure --help, $CPPFLAGS
is in fact not influential.
--- rsync-2.5.5/Makefile.in~2002-03-24 23:36:34.0 -0500
+++ rsync-2.5.5/Makefile.in 2002-11-12 17:52:04.0 -0500
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
LIB
Today, Mozzi wrote:
> In all test the same 2.5 Gig logfile was used for transfer
> (2719312019 Nov 12 11:42 maillog.back)
> (2.5G Nov 12 11:42 maillog.back)
> The transfer was done over two Gigabit nic's one onboard broadcom on
> IBM X440 server, Other Intel on standard selfbuilt dual P3 880 machi
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:32:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'd call it a bug.
>
> No, it's not a bug. It's the heart of the rsync algorithm at work.
Hm...
> Rsync trades CPU and local file I/O for network I/O in order to reduce
> the amoun
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> The only alternative is to use the --whole-file option -- this option
> turns off the rsync algorithm and just sends all the changed files over
> the net completely (like an scp copy, but for changed files). This
> should only be use
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:32:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd call it a bug.
No, it's not a bug. It's the heart of the rsync algorithm at work.
Rsync trades CPU and local file I/O for network I/O in order to reduce
the amount of data that is transferred over the network. Your diagnosi
Dear rsync developers/contributors,
I've been using rsync either directly or indirectly via unison
etc. for quite a while now. Thanks for the great software and
algorithm!
cheers,
prabhu
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 03:27:03PM +0200, Mozzi wrote:
> [root@ais-mail01 root]# time rsync -pogrve ssh /var/spool/mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/spool/mail/
FYI, this command puts the "mail" dir inside /var/spool/mail on the
destination. You should add a trailing slash to the source path to
avoi
Heya !
It seems that we found it out. It's the partial flag. We tested a lot of stuff
here with strace and could see that after some while there came timeouts
on some descriptors (0 = stdin). We saw that after those timeouts got
heavy the blocks-in-out dropped heavily. But the reason wasn't clear
Hi all
I am still busy with my copy of the /var/spool/mail direcroty
I gave it this command
[root@ais-mail01 root]# time rsync -pogrve ssh /var/spool/mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/spool/mail/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
building file list ...
As top shows me it has been going 85 mins now buildi
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:06:40PM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> The weak checksum in checksum.c (see snippet below) differs
> substantially from the one discussed in Andrew Tridgell's doctoral
> thesis on rsync and elsewhere that I've been able to find. I didn't
> find discussion of the change i
One thing to add:
When this problem shows up, it seems rsync tries to get all the
CPU time on the sending side: 93-98%. Even ssh can only get between 2
and 5% of CPU time. Even though rsync is not growing in memory, top
shows nevertheless that it really gets almost every second of
CPU time. What i
Ok, now I found something. When the effect of heavy speed drop occurs,
it doesn't seem to send much bytes anymore. Block-in rate on the receiving
side drops dramatically from 31000/s to 5000/every 4-8 seconds (which
results to a rate of nearly 1 MB/s, that's what I got in the end).
CPU load goes d
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:03:34AM +0200, Mozzi wrote:
>
> Haile the list ;-)
>
> I am new to this list and this is my first post so grretings to all and
> nice to meet you.
>
> I am setting up rsync here to do a MASSIVE copy from one machine to the
> other.
> I am moving mail servers so I m
Hi all
I just ran these tests on my network and came up with these results.
I found it interesting and thought I would share.
In all test the same 2.5 Gig logfile was used for transfer
(2719312019 Nov 12 11:42 maillog.back)
(2.5G Nov 12 11:42 maillog.back)
The transfer was done over two Gigabit n
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, I've been saying:
> But why does it only happen with rsync ?
Ok, the last tests with rsync/rsh have shown the following:
(all on the receiving side)
CPU: 100%
Load: 2.5
blocks in: 38000/s
even though nothing get written
(no statistics)
when it starts to write, it goes from 1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:27:12AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, jw schultz wrote:
>
> > What is the CPU load of rsync on the receiver? That is
> > important.
>
> I'll check that.
>
> >> The disks have an upper limit of 52 MB/s (ext2) respectively
> >> 45 MB/s (ext3). I
Haile the list ;-)
I am new to this list and this is my first post so grretings to all and
nice to meet you.
I am setting up rsync here to do a MASSIVE copy from one machine to the
other.
I am moving mail servers so I must copy /var/spool/mail/ over to the
other machine.
I understand and hav
24 matches
Mail list logo
