Out of the office.

2002-07-17 Thread chris . czel
I will be out of the office starting 07/15/2002 and will not return until 07/19/2002. I will respond to your message when I return. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Eric Whiting
Dave North wrote: > > We have an interesting quandry here. When I'm rsync'ing my directory > tree (100 directories each containing 1000 files) I see some strange > results: > > All of these machines are on their own network segment (100t) in our QA > lab > > Solaris->Solaris - time taken: 11m3

RE: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Matthew Gavin
> In each instance I have rsync running as a server on the target machine > (Linux in each case). I just can't explain why the performance is just > so AMAZING on Linux. Any ideas? Because Linux Rocks !! M@ -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Be

Re: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:52:15PM -0400, Dave North wrote: > We have an interesting quandry here. When I'm rsync'ing my directory > tree (100 directories each containing 1000 files) I see some strange > results: > > All of these machines are on their own network segment (100t) in our QA > lab >

Re: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:35:52PM -0400, Dave North wrote: > That's a hell of a difference. Very peculiar how the sun FS can be so > incredibly slow compared to Linux - and these are reasonably high end > sun Netra machines. Very strange. I wonder how reliable the Linux FS > is then if it's ex

Re: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Corey Stup
> DN: You're onto something here...I just did an un-tar of the file > containing my data (100,000 files) and saw: > > Solaris: 11m:28.5s > Linux:1m26.923s > > That's a hell of a difference. Very peculiar how the sun FS can be so > incredibly slow compared to Linux - and these are

RE: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Dave North
-Original Message- From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:22 PM To: Dave North Cc: Bernard A Badger; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux and Solaris performance > DN: Sorry, I forgot to mention. NONE of the files exist on the target > machin

Re: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Bennett Todd
Is the hardware comparable? It can be hard finding truly comparable hardware between sparc and x86 --- performance is a multidimensional attribute, and any given pair of boxes will scale differently on different performance metrics. Any given application of rsync will weight various performance me

Re: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 02:35:52PM -0400, Dave North wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Bernard A Badger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Linux and Solaris performance > > > In each instance I have rsync runn

RE: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Dave North
-Original Message- From: Bernard A Badger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Linux and Solaris performance > In each instance I have rsync running as a server on the target machine > (Linux in each case). I just can't ex

RE: Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Bernard A Badger
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Dave North > Subject: Linux and Solaris performance > > We have an interesting quandry here. When I'm rsync'ing my directory > tree (100 directories each containing 1000 files) I see some strange > re

Linux and Solaris performance

2002-07-17 Thread Dave North
We have an interesting quandry here. When I'm rsync'ing my directory tree (100 directories each containing 1000 files) I see some strange results: All of these machines are on their own network segment (100t) in our QA lab Solaris->Solaris - time taken: 11m32s Solaris->RH Linux 7.2 - time taken

Re: rsync memory usage

2002-07-17 Thread tim . conway
Lutz: This has been a frequent topic of discussion. Wayne Davidson (and probably others) is working on a different way, but currently, this method is integral to rsync, and to change it will be a major revision. For my application, I actually had to write my own syncronization program that

rsync memory usage

2002-07-17 Thread Lutz Pressler
Hi, we are using rsync to mirror large trees (>> 50 GB, >> 2 mio files) offsite (rsync -e ssh with forced ssh command on the remote side). The main problem occuring is memory usage (especially as the remote system has no swap space configured for security reasons): It seems that the rsync proces