Can any one help me out?...

2002-07-10 Thread maniezhilan
Dear all, I am ne to rsync, and went through lot of sites and docs. Finally I am putiing my queries here. can any one help me out, to give a solution for me. I am using Redhat 7.2 , rsync-2.4.6-1, openssh-3.4p1-1. My Problems: 1. I want to run rsync in server mode in one of the machine (rsync -

RE: Standalone rsync for Win98?

2002-07-10 Thread David E. Weekly
>>> OK, but maybe the slowdown is acceptable on Win98, where at the moment you have no working rsync at all. <<< An excellent point. >>> If by "standalone" you mean a native Windows version, then it doesn't exist because nobody has written it. Have a go! <<< PROJECT! Cheerio, David E. Wee

Re: Rsync Memory Issues - Kernel 2.4.18 - Box Hangs

2002-07-10 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:50:00PM -0700, Rick Parada wrote: > Hi, > > Im running a Dell 6450 w/ 4GB of memory, 2 2GB Swap Partitions. Redhat 7.3 > kernel 2.4.18 (kernel.org). It runs our images for our site. We use rsync to > sync images from a main image box. It runs fine for maybe 4 days until

Re: strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-relatedrsync extension)

2002-07-10 Thread Eric Horst
> That is something that I'm working on with my rZync application. It > implements a new protocol that can begin transferring files as soon as > the first directory has been transferred and compared. The program is > not yet ready for someone with millions of files to test, though Wayne, I loo

Re: strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-relatedrsync extension)

2002-07-10 Thread Wayne Davison
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Eric Horst wrote: > Not to mention, is it a real long-term goal is to redesign rsync to deal > with large numbers of files by not building the entire file list up front? That is something that I'm working on with my rZync application. It implements a new protocol that can beg

Rsync Memory Issues - Kernel 2.4.18 - Box Hangs

2002-07-10 Thread Rick Parada
Hi, Im running a Dell 6450 w/ 4GB of memory, 2 2GB Swap Partitions. Redhat 7.3 kernel 2.4.18 (kernel.org). It runs our images for our site. We use rsync to sync images from a main image box. It runs fine for maybe 4 days untill all memory is in cache, and like 7MB of physical memory is free. The

[rsync] memory leak: correction

2002-07-10 Thread Lars J. Buitinck
correction to yesterday's bug report: code fragment should have been if ((dont = strdup(dont)) == NULL) return; if ((fname = strdup(fname)) == NULL) { free(dont); return; } -- If I traveled to the end of the rainbow As Dame

It is beneficial to your library & its patrons to have the book (Please suggest)

2002-07-10 Thread Dr. Carter
Dear Sir/Ma'am: It is significantly beneficial to your library and its patrons to have a book titled "Complete Conduct Principles for the 21st Century" by Dr. John Newton. Please suggest to your local library(ies) that the book be purchased. This is a great contribution you can make to your

RE: Standalone rsync for Win98?

2002-07-10 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Wednesday 10 Jul 02, David E. Weekly writes: > David, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Let me clarify my original post. We are indeed using Cygwin, but an older > version, as recent builds of Cygwin take obscenely long to do simple > operations like "rm", "touch", "cp", or "tar" (when uncomp

RE: Standalone rsync for Win98?

2002-07-10 Thread David E. Weekly
David, Thank you for your reply. Let me clarify my original post. We are indeed using Cygwin, but an older version, as recent builds of Cygwin take obscenely long to do simple operations like "rm", "touch", "cp", or "tar" (when uncompressing) on Windows 2000 using NTFS. Consequently, we've stuck

Standalone rsync for Win98?

2002-07-10 Thread David Starks-Browning
On Tuesday 9 Jul 02, David E. Weekly writes: > We use rsync extensively at our company for Unix servers and Windows > 2000/XP/ME interoperability. Unfortuantely, our rsync.exe that runs > fine in 2000, ME, and XP crashes under Win98. Cygwin does offer an > answer, but due to performance reasons, w

*****SPAM***** ATTENTION! Well-Paid Job in the Internet!

2002-07-10 Thread Please
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content a