On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 01:32, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
> Debian r2.5 (Potato)
> rsync version 2.3.2 protocol version 21
> ( the latest stable deb version anyway :)
>
> RE: absolutely older file keeps getting chosen for update
This could be some sort of NFS bug, but you might want to tr
[resent by mbp]
On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 10:22, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> If you run rsync with a subshell through ssh.com's ssh and sshd and
> then kill the client with ctrl-C, the rsync server process running on
> the remote machine grows without bound and eventually completely hoses
> the machine
How cool!
--
Martin
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, Martin!
I have ported rsync to OS/390 Open Edition, currently named z/OS Unix
System Services. Using my port, it is possible to transfer text files
between IBM mainframe and UNIX machines, having automatic code page
conversion which is for what I
We have some speed/performance issues:
We have a 100M fullduplex private network setup to handle rsync transfers
to our "mirror" server with a command like:
time rsync -e ssh -avzl --delete --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync \
--exclude ".netscape/cache/" --delete-excluded \
bigs
The rsync mailing list should now be protected by SpamAssassin
. If your messages bounced during installation
glitches, or if you have any trouble, please let me know.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://ww
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:40:34PM +0300, Kalev Soikonen wrote:
> Digging around in the sources (uhg), I found that this occurs because...
> batch.c line 485 dereferences s->sums[i] which is NULL, because... generator
> thinks it can disable_deltas_p() when batches are read.
Ouch. This sounds r
I needed a tool to produce diffs of binary volumes, and to apply them as
patches accordingly. So I tried the 'batch mode' that was added to rsync,
but it invariably segfaulted on reading the batches...
$ sh foo.rsync_argvs
foo.rsync_argvs: line 1: 8971 Segmentation fault r
