On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:50:59PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2002, terrell Larson wrote:
> > The [option-specifying form] of the -e option is not documented.
> > IMHO it should be.
>
> I agree. I've whipped up the following patch for rsync.yo, which I
> will commit to CVS in a
136 BUG REPORTS
137 ---
138
139 If you have web access then please look at
140 http://rsync.samba.org/rsync/
141
142 This will give you access to the bug tracking system used by the
143 developers of rsync and will allow you to look at other bug reports or
I'm working on a frontend to rsync, and I've got a problem.
It's easy to get a list of files and directories from a specific path on an
rsync server. But from the root, I've found it very difficult to get a list
of modules.
I cannot see when the modt stops, and when the list begins. Can anybod
And today is apparently my day to put *both* feet in my mouth concurrently.
The behavior is still being evinced on the server side, even with a
correctly syntaxed exclude line.
*sigh*
Oh well. At this point, I'm going to stop posting to the list about this.
--
To unsubscribe or change opti
Please ignore that email. I just realized my error - missing the all
important = on the line.
DUH.
*shakes head*
Sorry folks.
Scott
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hello all,
I've found some behavior in 2.5.5 that is contrary to the documentation
in the man page.
Specifically, I'm running an rsync server (i.e. from inetd with
--daemon),and in the module definition I'm specifying the line "exclude
nosyncdir". The documentation for rsyncd.conf indicates
On Fri, 10 May 2002, terrell Larson wrote:
> If rsync is directed to copy a directory tree into another machine and
> the target directory does not exist then rsync will not create the
> required path
Dave Dykstra just recently responded to another user that this is the
intended behavior of rsync
I'm new to this list and I hope this is the proper way to submit a bug. If not then
please advise. Also I'm not a list subscriber so please email me directly and cc the
list if appropriate.
I beleive I have found a bug in rsync. It is reproducable and easy to confirm.
summary:
===
If r
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> If you dynamically created a */*/*/foo/* pattern with the number of */
> to match the current path it would only have to call fnmatch once.
That's assuming the pattern doesn't contain an interior/trailing "**"
(which could only use the try-after-each-sla
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're asking for. Please give a simple
example, including the rsync command line you use that gives you the
undesired results.
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 02:26:17PM +0200, Mark Pitt wrote:
>
>
>
> Using --existing, I would like to transfer file
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:42:41PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > How many times would you have to call fnmatch for every file?
>
> We'd call fnmatch() an extra time for every slash in the path. However,
> the performance hit of this new loop on the pat
I took a look in the rsync CVS; the change to rsync that (unintentionally)
prevented this problem was put into version 2.4.6 by Andrew Tridgell:
http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/main.c.diff?r1=1.126&r2=1.124
I'm still concerned that we might run into a problem with ignored signals
b
Max Bowsher wrote:
>>I think it might be too risky for 2.5.6 and perhaps should wait to 2.6.0.
>>
>>- Dave
>>
>>
>
>Yes, now the small fix has turned into a multi-source file minor redesign, lets
>hold it until after 2.5.6 - at least for the standard release.
>
>To Lapo Luchini: Maybe this
> I think it might be too risky for 2.5.6 and perhaps should wait to 2.6.0.
>
> - Dave
Yes, now the small fix has turned into a multi-source file minor redesign, lets
hold it until after 2.5.6 - at least for the standard release.
To Lapo Luchini: Maybe this could go into the cygwin 2.5.6-1 as a
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:22:45PM -0700, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 9 May 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The answer has to come from Martin and I haven't seen anything posted
> > from him lately, he must be unavailable.
>
> Sorry, I've been out of town this week.
>
> > On Tue,
Using --existing, I would like to transfer files created by root to home
dirs, where the files would be updated, but leave the user,group and perms
as they were. ie root creates a new file on the sending system, rsyncs it
to the home dir of the user, leaving the perms untouched.
Seems there i
At Friday 10 May 2002 14:15 Bove, Lui wrote:
> Is it possible to use rsync to synchronize the /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow,
> /etc/shadow- files under linux?
If you dare to, why not? .o)
--
Michael Zimmermann (Vegaa Safety and Security for Internet Services)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone +49 89 6283 7
Bug seems to have been fixed in -current release ( SSH Bug 182 ) not sure
when this will be available/official.
Going to stick to 2.9.9 on the one machine until resolved.
Mark Pitt
SP Administrator
IBM, Campus Winterthur
058-333-1542
Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09.05.2002 16:34:57
Title: Using rsync to sync up password file
Is it possible to use rsync to synchronize the /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/shadow- files under linux?
Lui Bove
AIM Funds Management Inc.
5140 Yonge St.
Toronto, Ont. M2N 6X7
Tel: 416-228-3664
Fax: 416-590-7742
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello,
when I use rsync from commandline (RH 7.2, ssh2),
it works fine.
rsync -e ssh -a -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/samba/m/aaa.txt
/home/m/aaa.txt
but
when I try to use it in crontab such as
33 11 * * * rsync -e ssh -a -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/samba/m/aaa.txt
/home/m/aaa.txt
or
33 11
We have AIX 4.3.3 ML09 and AIX 5.1 ML01
I have narrowed the problem down, it is nothing to do with
uni/multiprocessor machines.
Both rsync 2.3.1 compiled by Bull in an installp and a gcc compiled
version of 2.4.5 ( by me ) both have exactly the same problem with SSH
3.1.p1 and both DONT have t
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THIS IS A LINK TO A SITE THAT CONTAINS ADULT MATERIAL.
IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 THEN PLEASE DELETE THIS EMAIL AT ONCE.
Parents, this email was sent by Margie NOT BY HORNEYCARDS.COM If this is an inappropriate correspondence
please take it up with Margie.
Hi, Margie has sent you
Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I've been out of town this week.
No problem.
> This is the shutdown one, right? I wanted to check about portability
> before we put it in. Snader's "Effective TCP/IP Programming" says that
>
> shutdown(fd, 1);
>
> is OK on both Unix and Windows
23 matches
Mail list logo
