Hi Martin,
> > > Shouldn't/couldn't the "ignore silently if excluded" be
> specified less
> > > strictly to cover the above "permission denied" error as well?
> >
> > I think you're right. Martin Pool, what do you think?
> Martin Bene, could
> > you please try coding and testing a patch that
There's no way to do that at the moment; --chmod and --chown options
to set metadata in flight are on the todo list. In fact I think
there's a patch around for chmod, though I seem to remember the last
version had a couple of shortcomings.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://
Is there a way to specify to rsync that metadata should NOT be updated
unless the object was created, or the contents of a file was modified.
Specifically, what I want to do is use rsync to "install" a file tree
of a few changes (a package being replicated to multiple machines after
it has been c
Hi Martin,
I guess I need to be more specific. I have a unix user who has unix
machines at home and at work. He wants local access to the same set of
files whether he's at home or at work.
> If each side updates a non-overlapping set of files you can do this
> using --update to push only the n
Hi Dave,
on Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:52:56 -0500 Dave Dykstra wrote
concerning "Re: 4.4BSD chflags support for rsync" something like this:
> I think the --flags patch is probably fine, except that that the short
> description should at least say "preserve file flags" instead of just
> "preserve flag
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:18:59PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> The code is currently doing a "continue" after that error, not an exit, so
> it should be continuing on to do the rest of the files before it exits.
> However, an error message is printed at exit time.
It sounds like the files rsync
On 25 Apr 2002, Rich Winkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the junk mail, it seems my last post was lost in the ether,
> despite being successfully delivered to lists.samba.org (!)
> Very frustrating, since I didn't keep a copy of it.
>
> My question was regarding what might be called sym
On 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem is caused because rsync does not close its sockets, and WinSock is a
> > quite strict on this. The solution is to shutdown and close the fd.
> > This is a 5-minute hack I've done to fix the obvious occurrences of the problem.
On 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shouldn't/couldn't the "ignore silently if excluded" be specified less
> > strictly to cover the above "permission denied" error as well?
>
> I think you're right. Martin Pool, what do you think? Martin Bene, could
> you please try co
Sorry for the junk mail, it seems my last post was lost in the ether,
despite being successfully delivered to lists.samba.org (!)
Very frustrating, since I didn't keep a copy of it.
My question was regarding what might be called symmetric mirroring,
where two sets of identical files, both being s
On 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you mean rsync's call to chroot, or a chroot around the whole
> invocation of rsync? Rsync's chroot doesn't happen until after the "uid ="
> in rsyncd.conf is processed, so that still works without copying in the
> passwd file.
Oh, q
123
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:46:09PM -0400, Shirish H. Phatak wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I can definitely help in managing the librsync package, especially
> since I will be maintaining our local tree anyway. As of now, I don't
> have the resources to get the Windows stuff tested; however, I can
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> I think --delete-after should imply --delete. Would someone like to
> work up the simple patch to the code and the man page?
Sure. Here's one (note that the OPT_DELETE_AFTER enum was already
defined for some reason).
..wayne..
---8<--8<--8<--
Does anybody know if this might cause problems on non-Windows machines?
Would "shutdown" need to be checked in configure, or is it implemented on
all Unix variants? I don't recall ever seeing a need for it on Unix.
- Dave
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:39:57AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> The proble
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Michael Zimmermann wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> there are two new rsync-features I made up and would like to discuss with you.
>
> If you think these new features might be useful for the whole rsync-community,
> please give me a note and I'll send you
Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> Eric, which version of Sun operating system were you running, and was there
> any NFS involved? What's a NAS disk?
Yes NFS on both ends. Solaris 8 on destination. Netapps NAS boxes on
both ends.
NAS -- Network Attached Storage. Netapps F720 NFS 'toaster' boxes. (lots
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Martin Bene wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when syncing from windows NT/cygwin to linux usimg rsync 2.5.2 I get the
> following error:
>
> readlink pagefile.sys: Permission denied
> IO error encountered - skipping file deletion
>
> pagefile.sys is however in the excl
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:18:40PM -0800, Yuri Kretov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May be I am wrong, but why rsync tells me that it's nothing to do?
> I just want to synchronize the directory's attributes (with no recursion) such as:
> permissions, owner, group and time.
>
> Example:
> ===
>
> host
Eric, which version of Sun operating system were you running, and was there
any NFS involved? What's a NAS disk? I had a user who reported having
rsync (a CVS version between 2.5.4 and 2.5.5) produce a file filled with
nulls but he was copying from a Solaris client which was mounting over NFS
fr
I'm cleaning out my rsync mailbox and it looks like nobody responded
to your questions.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:56:18AM -0600, Poe Chen wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I'd like to know if there is a way to set the ownership/group/permission
> when you are transfering files from a Windows clients to a L
I'm sorry for the long delay in replying. I'm cleaning up my rsync mailbox
now after a one week vacation and about a month of not having time to look
at it.
I think the --flags patch is probably fine, except that that the short
description should at least say "preserve file flags" instead of jus
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:04:09PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to test this recently, but Dave just reminded
> me that it ought to merge soon and I agree.
>
> I was thinking about this the other day in the context of the
> Bitkeeper "bk url" manpage (if Colin will forgive m
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:08:56PM -0400, Corey Stup wrote:
>
> > The option --delete-after does not seem to work.
> >
> > In a command such as
> >
> > rysnc -avzSH --progress --stats --delete-after remote::XYZ/dirX /export/home
> > files removed from the source are not removed at the d
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:40:58PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2002, Sonu Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i get the following error:
> > @ERROR: invalid uid rsync
>
> You probably have a line like
>
> uid = rsync
>
> in the server's rsyncd.conf, but there's no such user defi
I see a lot of good advice has been posted about stuff that is quite good to
know about perl.
A simpler solution though might be the File::Rsync module available on CPAN.
I use it a lot and it works very well. It will generate the rsync command
line for you, and it can be given a callback which
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:57:56AM -0500, John Madden wrote:
> send_files failed to open //home/user/Maildir/new/_dwG.NeZv8.blah: No such
> file or directory
> rsync error: partial transfer (code 23) at main.c(578)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:50:41AM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
> > >> I'd be quite ha
27 matches
Mail list logo
